Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet

I am no Penn State fan (and my alma mater, UNC, has troubles of its own with the NCAA), but I don’t see why the NCAA has jurisdiction in this particular case. I understand that football coaches are involved, but does this really involve the football program in any real way? Now, I believe Penn State is accontable for these terrible actions and failures to act. I just don’t believe that the NCAA is the right body to deal with it.


7 posted on 07/23/2012 8:30:41 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NCLaw441

Head coach covers it up? Other coaches know.

Yes. That’s the football program and a breach of the public trust and conduct expected from any adult, much less one entrusted to train and teach young men.


13 posted on 07/23/2012 8:34:23 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: NCLaw441

The actions of Sandusky were covered up in order to prevent damage to the football program. That is the definition of an “unfair advantage,” the whole basis of all NCAA rules regarding recruiting, etc. The difference between this and, say, a player getting a ride across campus in a golf cart, is that these actions rise to the level of a criminal offense.


30 posted on 07/23/2012 8:41:36 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: NCLaw441

The NCAA has jurisdiction in the case, ultimately, because PSU is a member institution of the NCAA and this episode demonstrated not just a lack of institutional control, but a coordinated institutional effort to cover up crimes. If PSU didn’t think that the NCAA had jurisdiction, they could probably withdraw their membership, but then good luck on finding any games to compete in ever again. Also, the school signed off on the sanctions before they were announced, so that pretty much blows the “no jurisdiction” argument out of the water.


84 posted on 07/23/2012 9:05:49 AM PDT by RightFighter (It was all for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: NCLaw441
does this really involve the football program in any real way?

Are you suggesting with a straight face that they would have covered it up if it was the chess team coach instead of the football coach?

108 posted on 07/23/2012 9:21:47 AM PDT by Wise Hectare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: NCLaw441

“I am no Penn State fan (and my alma mater, UNC, has troubles of its own with the NCAA), but I don’t see why the NCAA has jurisdiction in this particular case. I understand that football coaches are involved, but does this really involve the football program in any real way? Now, I believe Penn State is accontable for these terrible actions and failures to act. I just don’t believe that the NCAA is the right body to deal with it.”

I know the NCAA sure does when the players mess up, on or off the field. I know Marshall U. players have been in trouble with the NCAA often for doing crimes off campus. So why not the coaches? The coaches should hold a higher standard as well. This is as about as low as any coach could sink.


202 posted on 07/23/2012 10:57:26 AM PDT by Morgana (This space for rent. Cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson