Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DuncanWaring

We live in America, not Cuba or Iran , people are entitled to the presumption of innocence. I thought we believed in the 4th amendment as conservatives. I guess we just decide when we don’t like someone that individual is guilty of something. That is my point.


34 posted on 07/23/2012 8:44:21 AM PDT by Perdogg (Let's leave reading things in the Constitution that aren't there to liberals and Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg

“Presumption of innocence” is not just a blind mantra we hum.

The standard for conviction in a criminal case is “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt”.

There can be no reasonable doubt that Joe Paterno did not know what Jerry Sandusky was doing.


37 posted on 07/23/2012 8:47:48 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Paterno’s huge mistake was in not insisting that Sandusky be completely barred from campus until the allegations were completely investigated and a decision made. I don’t think Paterno had any intention to enable Sandusky, but Paterno’s decision not to take a strong stance had the effect of enabling. Paterno had clear responsibility which he failed to fulfil, but he is not the monster that some are trying to make him out to be.


39 posted on 07/23/2012 8:48:34 AM PDT by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
People are entitled to the presumption of innocence in a court of law. We also are entitled to free speech.

NCAA is not a court of law. They investigate and impose sanctions under their own guidelines as is their right.

Penn State can add or remove statues without the government's approval.

46 posted on 07/23/2012 8:52:34 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Most conservatives know it’s the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution that guarantees the right to a trial.


50 posted on 07/23/2012 8:54:09 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
We live in America, not Cuba or Iran , people are entitled to the presumption of innocence.

As was pointed out yesterday on another thread, by that logic Hiler is innocent.

53 posted on 07/23/2012 8:55:01 AM PDT by Gamecock (We don't come to Christ to be born again; rather, we are born again in order to come to Christ. RCS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
We live in America, not Cuba or Iran , people are entitled to the presumption of innocence.

As was pointed out yesterday on another thread, by that logic Hiler is innocent.

54 posted on 07/23/2012 8:55:18 AM PDT by Gamecock (We don't come to Christ to be born again; rather, we are born again in order to come to Christ. RCS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
We live in America, not Cuba or Iran , people are entitled to the presumption of innocence. I thought we believed in the 4th amendment as conservatives. I guess we just decide when we don’t like someone that individual is guilty of something. That is my point.

If somebody reported to you that a man was raping little boys using the facilities that you control, would you pick up the phone and call the cops?

It's a simple yes or no question, no need to play any word games. Yes or no.
166 posted on 07/23/2012 10:16:27 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

“I thought we believed in the 4th amendment as conservatives.”

Sure, we believe in the 4th amendment, but that amendment is only a restriction on the government, not on the individual. We, as individuals, are all free to form our own opinions as to whether someone is guilty or innocent.

With Paterno, it isn’t about “not liking” him. There are plenty of people, like me, who had no opinion about the guy one way or the other, before this case became news, who have concluded that the guy made some really bad, probably criminal decisions. We didn’t conclude that because we wanted to, but because that’s what the evidence suggests. The public is not going to pretend that evidence doesn’t exist because Paterno died before he had his day in court.


167 posted on 07/23/2012 10:16:27 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

this has nothing to do with the 4th amendment.

why don’t we just dig up Papa Joe and give him his rights.

He will have in abstentia due process throughout these civil cases.

What 4th amendment????He was NEVER charged.
Talk about twisting conservatism into a pretzel just to defend a predator enabler. Go for it.


194 posted on 07/23/2012 10:45:30 AM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

This isn’t a criminal matter. There is no 4th amendment violation. The NCAA doesn’t hold trials. An investigation was done, and penalties are being doled out accordingly. Relax Matlock.


217 posted on 07/23/2012 11:27:51 AM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson