Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/02/2012 7:40:23 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Halfmanhalfamazing

No.


2 posted on 07/02/2012 7:41:20 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Ginsburg is far, far worse. Why wouldn’t you start with her?


4 posted on 07/02/2012 7:45:28 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

With an extreme liberal in the white house, and a democrat majority in the senate?

All of this impeachment talk is madness


5 posted on 07/02/2012 7:45:55 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

No.

It just leads to Obama or Romney getting one more shot at making things worse.


7 posted on 07/02/2012 7:46:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Sure, but only if we’re going to impeach the other commies too.


8 posted on 07/02/2012 7:47:44 PM PDT by RaisingCain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I’m of the opinion that if Obama is defeated in November because of Obamacare, John Roberts may have saved the country at the cost of his own reputation during his lifetime, and history will recognize him as one of the greatest of patriots.


9 posted on 07/02/2012 7:50:50 PM PDT by ExpatCanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
At the very least, a Congressional investigation should be launch to determine if there was an ulterior motive behind Roberts changing his position. From that outcome, the need for further action could be determined.
11 posted on 07/02/2012 7:51:08 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

No


12 posted on 07/02/2012 7:52:18 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
No.

Samuel Chase was impeached and aquitted. Mostly, even his most ardent critics in the Senate refused to convict him on the grounds of decision quality.

Obamacare, if replaced and repealed, must be (at this point) handled through the Legislative Branch, then signed by a new President. Even if this House (which I doubt would occur) drew up articles against him, it would only hurt them and make them look like sore losers.

IMO, any attempt to impeach him on these grounds would assure Dem retention of the Senate and introduce the real potential of House loss again, giving us Speaker Pelosi Part Deux. The outcome of the Presidental election, at that point, would be irrelevant.

13 posted on 07/02/2012 7:53:02 PM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

No!

There seems to be a silver lining in what Roberts actually did. I don’t think he did this to benefit Obamacare at all. I think he realized that if he threw it out, the democrats were going to push harder to get this legislation passed. What Roberts did was left it to the states.

Look at what the states are doing.... Many are not going to abide by it. The House is ready to bring it back to the House and repeal it as now it is a tax and not a penalty. They will have many democrats on their side since many are up for re-election. I think we need to just watch this! He also gave the government in no uncertain terms that they were not allowed to use the commerce clause in this manner - its a flat out tax. This makes Obama a liar in chief. This is payback time for Roberts.

He thought long and hard about this decision - lets give it time to fully sink in. I don’t think we should be going for his head at this time. He may have just saved us.

I have pretty strong feelings about this. There is something there that he did that definitely was not in BO’s favor.


16 posted on 07/02/2012 7:54:00 PM PDT by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

“We.need to start using this option”

If you had a Congress that would impeach Roberts it wouldn’t be necessary.

As it is, you are about 50-60 Senators short.

If it makes you feel better, dream on.


17 posted on 07/02/2012 7:54:20 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Anna Wintour makes Teresa Heinz Kerry look like Dolly Parton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
No grounds for impeachment.

Remember Roberts was one of five votes... and he changed his mind to make the wrong choice half-hearted. What about the other four full blown socialists that were a solid vote? What about Stephen Breyer, the Wise Latina, The Lady's Man Kagan, and Darth Vader Ginsburg? They will vote for the USAs destruction every time. If you can impeach Roberts for damaging the Constitution you can do the same to them.

18 posted on 07/02/2012 7:55:50 PM PDT by GregoTX (Federalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Unless it can be proven Roberts sold his vote for money or some other favor any talk of impeachment is a waste of time. As others have said with Obama in the WH any replacement would be far worse. Not liking the decision is not any sort of reason to impeach, and the argument that he subverted the Constitution is moot because the Constituion has, since Marbury, been whatever the Court says it is.


19 posted on 07/02/2012 7:56:04 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

There isn’t a provision for impeaching or firing SCOTUS members.


20 posted on 07/02/2012 7:57:58 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

No. Let’s stop coming up with silly options.


22 posted on 07/02/2012 7:59:20 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
And give Obama a chance to appoint a replacement?

Gee, I hope we can get someone MORE conservative from Obama, don't you?

23 posted on 07/02/2012 7:59:52 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

So Obama can replace him?


24 posted on 07/02/2012 8:00:10 PM PDT by NoLibZone (We must get down on our knees each day and thank God that McCain/Palin didn't win in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Definitely yes, but let’s wait until we have a Republican POTUS.

Roberts has shown himself to be of low moral character, and unfit to hold public office.


25 posted on 07/02/2012 8:00:51 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing; All

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America should quickly and voluntarily submit to an Impeachment Trial to clear the integrity and good name of the Supreme Court.

If found guilty, the Chief Justice should have swift and severe Justice.

If he is found not guilty, then there will be hell to pay as every Federal Judge in the Federal Court System will legislate all cases brought before them in any manner that they see fit.

The polarization of America will then be complete, with the Supreme Court being the last of the major Federal Branches of Government to fall to the European Feudal/Socialist System of Slavery.

BTW, read my tag line for the correct legal opinion on this topic.


31 posted on 07/02/2012 8:05:04 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Just got home from work...obligitory shower took and beer drank...ping me tomorrow, as I gotta few opinions on yer subject...g’night.


33 posted on 07/02/2012 8:06:31 PM PDT by SgtBob (Freedom is not for the faint of heart. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson