Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

Was the implication that 30% of kids are fathered by someone other than the assumed father?

Skewed data source.

My bet is that only men with reasons to be suspicious have the child tested.


77 posted on 05/16/2012 9:18:44 AM PDT by BwanaNdege (Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: BwanaNdege
Was the implication that 30% of kids are fathered by someone other than the assumed father? Skewed data source.

Yes, those numbers came from testing done where the "official" father suspected something.

For cases not involving father suspicion, it varies, depending on country, race, and socio-economic status.

One study, "Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences", looked at various other studies. For non-disputed paternity (ie, the testing was not done because the father suspected anything), USA results were

Michigan white sample: 1.4%

Michigan black sample: 10.1%

California white sample: 2.7%

Hawaiian families: 2.3%


88 posted on 05/16/2012 10:28:04 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I canÂ’t be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson