To: dennisw
She wasn’t fired for shoplifting, she was fired for lying.
2 posted on
05/15/2012 2:24:05 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: dfwgator
Not necessarily lying. If they asked her about felonies, this would not have been a felony. I predict this one ends in a lawsuit, reinstatement, back pay and a huge cash penalty.
To: dfwgator
“She wasn’t fired for shoplifting, she was fired for lying.”
Last I checked Wells Fargo PAID their employees and executives to lie. What changed?
21 posted on
05/15/2012 3:56:44 PM PDT by
MeganC
(No way in Hell am I voting for Mitt Romney. Not now, not ever. Deal with it.)
To: dfwgator
She wasn’t fired for shoplifting, she was fired for lying. Oh, I love FR.
32 posted on
05/15/2012 4:24:39 PM PDT by
Fundamentally Fair
(Pictionary at the Rorschach's tonight!)
To: dfwgator
She wasn't fired for lying either. She was simply fired for having commited crimes that current law says disqualify her from a position of fiduciary trust.
She could probably fight that one in court since it involves ex post facto law.
These situations are not all that uncommon.
35 posted on
05/15/2012 5:03:12 PM PDT by
muawiyah
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson