Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hugin

It does seem odd, doesn’t it ? If they are concerned about meeting armed resistance, why do they not surround the house, announce themselves through a bullhorn, and see what response they get ? They can always perforate the house if the people refuse to come out or start shooting.

This family would have quietly exited the house with no shots fired, no damage, and the kid arrested. Of course, they also had a search warrant, so these cops would undoubtedly have torn up the house anyway. Judges should all have at least one experience of a search warrant being served on their home so they can experience having all their furniture slashed up and destroyed. They seem way too eager to issue search warrants that will destroy a person’s property.


31 posted on 05/14/2012 7:35:33 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Kellis91789

That’s a very good idea but it might be better with a twist - require the judge to supervise the raid.


40 posted on 05/14/2012 9:00:15 PM PDT by Archer24 (Get a life - I've had two and am lookingfor more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Kellis91789

It’s like those commercials...

When you get a federal anti-terrorism grant, you get a SWAT Squad.

When you get a SWAT Squad, you want to use your SWAT Squad.

When you want to use your SWAT Squad, you make pre-dawn raids for routine arrests.

When you make pre-dawn raids for routine arrests, you terrorize innocent families and kill their dogs.

Don’t terrorize innocent families and kill their dogs.


42 posted on 05/15/2012 3:09:47 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson