Where did I advocate a muted response? You are delusional
I just went back through the thread, and see that you weren't the one who advocated that. Somehow, I confused you with that poster, as I was debating you both on similar points, at the same time.
Here is one your first posts on the thread that caught my eye. Personally, I think it's over the top, and a tad alarmist:
You will have more need of a firearm and ammunition if he loses than if he wins. The civil unrest that will follow an Obama defeat will last a lot longer than 2-1/2 months and will make most cities uninhabitable for non-black citizens. The unrest will be confabulated to indicate that his loss was racially motivated. Take cover.
You went on to say in a later post:
If only 1% of the urban black population takes up arms or otherwise seeks to create chaos, our cities would be unlivable.
Although you're not advocating a 'muted response', you do appear to be fear mongering to some of the most well armed, situationally aware, and courageous people around. Those who are prepared to defend themselves and their loved ones don't talk that way. I suggest you rectify that as soon as possible, if you honestly believe the world is going to melt down if Obama loses.