Replies

Another post took some of my thunder, but my stance has always been, how far do we go back? The Mexicans say they want Cali and southwest, Texas back, okay, did this land always belong to Mexico, oh that's right it was won from the Spaniards, so we should give it all back to them, but wait they took it from others, who took it from others, in fact Mexico was never a country till recently, the land was conquered by Spanish and then won in the revolution, so Mexico needs to give the land back to the Aztecs and the Incas, but I imagine they took it from others, and the America "Indians", I am so tired of hearing how they were all living in harmony singing Kum Bah Ya till the white man showed up. Bullsh*t, they were killing each other and capturing land for a long time before we got here, this goes for every country in the world. I call it "recent-ism", that is we have to give land back to those we took it from last, but it doesn't go any further. UN get the F*CK out of here you bloated, croaked, scandal laden, fraudulent, criminal, Jew hating, mussy lovin anti-american, anti-freedom pieces of SH*T.

Unfortunately the US played the same games. The Chinese must allow Taiwan to declare independence, but the US crushed the Confederate States in the War of Southern Succession. The US backed the existence of Israel after the Romans kicked them out for over 1700+ years and over riding the Arabs who live there and now we are upset by the UN demand for giving land back to the Indians after the US took it 200+ years ago. Using Israel as a basis, the Indian claims to US land is at least 10x stronger then the Jewish claims to Arab lands for a homeland. Before all you freepers freak out about my post, the moral of the lesson is minimize overseas entanglements, because in order to maintain an empire, one has to become a hypocrite and end up making enemies that otherwise may not happen if we have kept ourselves home minding our own business.