“The principle of unjust internment exists for non-collaborators too.”
The smart evade, the brave fight and die in the Warsaw Ghetto or fight and survive in the resistance. The corrupt serve as kapos, urging surrender and compromise, and the cowardly and foolish listen to the kapos and board the cattle cars to the camps, thinking they have selected ‘the lesser evil’.
This is a time of choosing, and choosing entails rejecting as well. I reject Willard Mitt Romney as vehemently as Barack Hussein Obama, and for very nearly identical reasons.
This appears to be bad sentence construction. Applying your own reasoning on such matters, can we conclude you lack intelligence and your arguments are invalid? Is it true that "The illiteracy further undermines the vapid argument."?