>>Oh, I gave you an answer.<<
No you didn’t. You just fell back on argumentum ad absurdum.
It is a valid forensic approach, but certainly a classic (and humorous) logical fallacy.
Are you shooting for every possible logical fallacy possible? You are a great example for many, so far.
Oh, you think so?
You think asking for links to another scenario of the exact same circumstances as the one under consideration, but with a different outcome predicated on the sex of the subject is a reasonable request?
And where do you see an absurdum argument?
You use “logical fallacies” like a kid faking an accent.