To Shelly Dankert I would say (using her own words): “That doesn’t mean it’s ‘OK’ for you to make and/or spread BASELESS ........... prognostications about the ultimate cause of his (Breitbart’s) death.......If.......you continue to spread the .............. theories about Andrew’s death, shame on you. Shame on you for spreading lies.”
Because that’s what she is doing when she essentially ASSUMES that he died of natural causes and self-righteously declares that anyone who harbors any suspicion whatsoever that there MAY be A POSSIBILITY of a non natural cause of death is a CONSPIRACY THEORIST and, by implication, a nut-case. I’m surprised she’s not out DEMANDING that the Los Angeles Medical Examiner cease and desist from carrying out an autopsy to determine the cause of death when it’s obvious to right thinking folks such as Miss Dankert that it’s due to natural causes.
I don’t know if Dankert was the person who posted the link to her blog here. If so, I would say that it is not good form to come here and, in effect, insult all FReepers who may have some suspicion.
As for me, I’m waiting for the medical examiner’s report.
Speaking of conspiracy theories = nut cases, wasn’t it the esteemed Cass Sunsteen the czar or upsurdity, that suggested ‘they’ put out the most outrageous stories and allow the conspiracies to fly thus allowing the lovely administration to continue framing decent people as ‘nuts’ -
yes, I believe it was.
To the one who asks ‘why’ anyone would want to off Breitbart, my goodness, do some homework and see how the man got under the skin of the best of the best of the loony left.
no, it’s called her viewpoint, and this is what urks me on some of these boards. From “birthers”, 911 truthers, Trig truthers and the lot, anyone who differs gets smack, called a nut, a cover up conspirator and so forth.
And your last post was waaaaay over the top. My eyes rolled on your rant that somehow she’s part of the plot to stop the medical examiner.
I guess the PJMedia board is part of it was well. Sheesh.