Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

Does anyone else catch what’s missing in this?

The Roswell Incident happened in 1947. This is dated 1950, and makes no mention of Roswell or any location near Roswell. Now, let’s forget the silliness about high-powered radar taking down a ship capable of interstellar flight, and presume the Air Force was grasping at straws with what they’d soon recognize was a silly notion. Let’s say the bandages had nothing to do with 1940s flight suits, but only 1940s mentality at interpreting strange clothing. Here’s the thing: Any super-highly charged radar near Roswell that could inspire such a silly grasping at straws?


118 posted on 04/08/2011 9:53:05 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

Uhhhhhhhhhhh

your flawed assumptions are showing

AGAIN.

The small craft involved in Roswell as well as the other two . . . were NOT interstellar ships. No one, to my knowledge, has EVER claimed they were.


123 posted on 04/08/2011 10:15:36 PM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

The bit about our intensified radar installations . . . set up largely because of the hyper secret research about the a-bomb etc. in NM at the time . . .

the critters TOLD our folks that’s what caused their craft to crash. After they realized that and made some adjustments, purportedly that problem didn’t occur again.

However, other sources also note that the propulsion of those types of craft involves essentially surfing a gravity wave or some such . . . at least that the craft is inherently somewhat unstable. And, NO technology is fool proof.

My relative said we had teams that could go INSTANTANEOUSLY to any spot on the globe to clean up a UFO crash.


125 posted on 04/08/2011 10:18:37 PM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

The only crashes (3, actually) pertaining to the topic to that point in time

were near Roswell.

The addressees to the message would have KNOWN that.

Is your groping for any explanation but the truth getting a bit desperate?


128 posted on 04/08/2011 10:21:41 PM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
Now, let’s forget the silliness about high-powered radar taking down a ship capable of interstellar flight

Actually that is plausible.
You have to figure any alien ship is going to be pure wireless in it's control systems, computer systems, and interface systems. Wireless is RF (radio frequencies). Look at the stuff that we have now that is wireless.

Back in the late 40's and 50's we had brute force radar systems with *Big honking* water cooled vacuum tubes in the output stages. Lots and lots of power because the return receivers were not as sensitive as we have today.
Now think what a really *Hot*, focused radar beam would do to our typical electronics today, operating at 1 to 3 vote logic levels.
The little gray guys and their super, super sensitive and sophisticated electronics could really have been caught flatfooted when hit by such a power RF source.
I say plausible.

129 posted on 04/08/2011 10:25:02 PM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Bachmann, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson