WND sources in Kenya described the Smith document as a clever forgery ...
But when WND sources in Kenya contacted Coast Provincial General Hospital, no administrator would verify the authenticity of the document.
Of course, I'm sure your next comment will be to play semantics games because I used the term 'no good' while WND uses 'clever forgery', but I expect that when people really 'hope for change' they buy anything.
Interesting how that is written. “No adminstrator would verify the authenticity of the document.” This doesn’t mean that the document is fake. No administrator has verified the authenticity of Obama’s alleged COLB, yet several people included LMSM reporters seem to think it’s real. Not verifying the authenticity of something still leaves it to be verified.
Lets get real here you just saw a video that shows how Hawaii Officials parsed words to give false impressions and you are trying to say that refusal to authenticate a document is the same as saying it is bad. The "clever forgery" is an opinion not a statement of fact.(once again worthless, equal to my unnamed sources saying Obamas COLB is bad and Smiths BC is good, opinion not fact.) So then since Hawaii wont authenticate Obamas COLB and neither will Kapiolani Hospital, then his COLB and BC are bad according to your "theory". THIS IS NOT SEMANTICS IT IS ACCURACY.
You are doing exactly what we are complaining about, changing words to meet agendas and give "wiggle room" to deception. Please be more accurate, thank you. Did you not learn from Clinton's parsing is?