Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JRandomFreeper

Isn’t that a good thing, when it comes to trying to transmit? I mean doesn’t increased sun activity make radio transmission poor?


43 posted on 06/14/2010 8:22:30 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Beowulf9
doesn’t increased sun activity make radio transmission poor?

No, not if you're relying on refraction off the ionosphere. Most long haul RF transmissions require refraction off the E or F layers in the atmosphere. The level of ionozation determines what the maximum usable frequency is. That determines how far the propogation works (very simplified version of mechanism).

51 posted on 06/14/2010 8:29:45 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Beowulf9
I mean doesn’t increased sun activity make radio transmission poor?

ACK! NO! The sun spots and spurts excite the ionosphere and make it all shiny and reflective. The MUF (maximum usable frequency) climbs off the scale at a real peak. Otherwise, high frequency radio waves just leave earth to annoy civilizations hundreds of light years away.

Sunspots trap the radio waves to the planet and let you talk with very low power all over the globe.

Thats a Good Thing(tm). /johnny

52 posted on 06/14/2010 8:33:49 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson