Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LeGrande
Said grey_whiskers:--This part of the post explicitly said, that the coordinate system was chosen for ease of use, not because one was "true" and the other "false".
Replied LeGrande:That is correct. They are equivalent. There is no absolute frame of reference. The only thing that is fixed is the speed of light. Time and distance are variables.


But when there is a third body in motion (for example, light) then we can measure and calculate angles and distances between all three -- and now being orbited and spinning are no longer indistinguishable.

-Jesse
1,278 posted on 02/08/2009 11:41:41 AM PST by mrjesse (Could it be true? Imagine, being forgiven, and having a cause, greater then yourself, to live for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1275 | View Replies ]


To: mrjesse
But when there is a third body in motion (for example, light) then we can measure and calculate angles and distances between all three -- and now being orbited and spinning are no longer indistinguishable.

Light is not a third body, that was Einsteins point. You can't use light to determine your absolute velocity, there is no aether (or fixed velocity for that matter). Did you miss my example of the people floating in space with radar guns?

The use of a third body for reference only changes the point of reference, which can be very helpful and it can simply be an arbitrary point, it doesn't have to be a 'body'. Did you not look at the Merry go Round animation that I linked to?

1,283 posted on 02/08/2009 7:50:35 PM PST by LeGrande (I once heard a smart man say that you canÂ’t reason someone out of something that they didnÂ’t reaso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson