The arguement isn’t about socialized anything. Once conservatives understand that the arguement is forcing others to pay for something for other people we will win the arguement.
Whatever the topic is only diverts us from the true issue. And this is done for exactly that reason.
Who can argue against feeding the hungry?
Who can argue against forcing others to give you their earnings to serve their own goals? This is robbery, extortion or whatever term you use it is evil.
It’s funny.
The person I’m referring to lives in a house much larger than mine, makes more money than I do (I think), and seems to think it’s ok to tax people more.
I just usually say he’s a lib, because he can afford to be.
I hear what you are saying.
Unfortunately we are too easily dismissed as “selfish”.
I can; and often do.
If it's voluntary it works like a charm. I can identify the ones that choose to go hungry and those that get there in spite of all their efforts and I can tell who's who.
When that choice is made for me by the welfare industry, it's legalized slavery, pure and simple. And they didn't need to send boats to pick me up and haul me to America do work and pay --- or else.