I am merely pointing out a fact. There is no competing scientific theory for the origin of species. There is, however, mountains of empirical and observational evidence for the evolution of species through natural selection.
If you have an alternative scientific theory, state it. State your hypothesis and the experiments you have done that support your hypothesis so other scientists can try to replicate them.
That's hillarious from an evo.
“If you have an alternative scientific theory, state it.”
The fact that there is no competing theory to state (and I freely admit that ID and Creationism are not scientific because they cannot be tested) has no bearing on whether or not the TOE is valid.
I don’t understand why people on FR make this assertion. The TOE has to stand or fall on its own, regardless of whether there is a competing theory to investigate or not.