Did you actually read this article and evaluate it on its merits, or does the usual trick of throwing smears by association convince you that it’s not even worth reading ?
That last is what iowamark is saying.
Had you done any due diligence, you would find that Baughman’s been hired at times as a consultant for Scientology but is not one himself.
Whatever you, I or any one else thinks of Scientology, you should always evaluate a thing firstly on its factual basis.
iowamark did not.
I read the article. Didn’t do any in-depth research into the merits of Dr. Baughman though. My point was simply this - IF he is a scientologist, it can be rightly claimed that his opinion is tainted.
Speaking of factual basis, seems that Rebecca Riley’s case involved just a bit more than her being given psychiatric drugs.
That said, I think ADHD is WAY overdiagnosed and as a homeschooling mom, I shudder to think what teachers might dispense to my crazy six year old. But to consider all psychiatric ailments as non-biological is frightening as well.