To: theFIRMbss
Almost certainly
sub-orbital weapons tests
account for Roswell.
= = =
99.9999% to 100% certain
NOT so.
The practice described was likely real enough.
But was NOT the explanation for Roswell.
ALL—as in 100% of the major principles who have any reliable recorded statements on the facts INSISTED that the craft and the critters were NOT OF THIS WORLD.
Try again. That hypothesis just does not hold water nor tinfoil.
108 posted on
07/02/2007 3:49:03 PM PDT by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
To: ALASKA; ActionNewsBill; airborne; albertp; andysandmikesmom; areafiftyone; aruanan; ...
114 posted on
07/02/2007 4:54:28 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Dave
(HDTV ping list, please FReepmail me if you would like your name added.)
To: Quix
>ALL—as in 100% of the major principles [sic] ... INSISTED that the craft and the critters were NOT OF THIS WORLD
Yeah, well, I've gone out
with women that I'd insist
were NOT OF THIS WORLD
but I would be wrong.
(Black ops projects typically
involve science that's
about fifteen years [!]
beyond what anybody
outside of black ops
high tech scientists
would recognize if they saw.
That's why it's secret.)
To: Quix
Quix, what have you learned abour the “drone” and why do you call it that?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson