Posted on 12/08/2006 4:56:23 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
Mel Gibson is sicker than we thought.
As his new film "Apocalypto" makes clear, he's not just a drinker and a raving anti-Semite, but a man with a grotesque appetite for human suffering and an enormous talent for exploiting it.
There was great violence in "Braveheart," too, but it was cloaked in historical context. And the stripping of Jesus' flesh in "The Passion of the Christ" had the cover of Scripture. But "Apocalypto" exists solely as an action-adventure and a deft cinematic demonstration of man's capacity for cruelty.
This is the true passion of Mel.
If you can take unflinching views of throats being slit, heads being caved in, a man's face being eaten by a panther, beating hearts torn from men's chests and decapitated heads bounding down the steps of a pyramid, you're in for a first-rate spectacle of inhumanity.
"Apocalypto" is set in the final days of the crumbling Mayan civilization, when drought and disease have driven warriors farther into the Mexican rainforest to collect natives for the sacrificial altar. As no one knows better than Gibson, the gods must be appeased.
One captive is Jaguar Paw (Rudy Youngblood), a gentle hunter/gatherer who hides his pregnant mate and child in a dry well before being led away. At the temple atop a massive stone pyramid, Jaguar Paw is about to meet his maker - or the Mayans' maker, or at least the priest's knife - when fate intervenes.
A total eclipse of the sun convinces the priest that the gods' thirst for blood has been sated, sparing Jaguar and the other captives. But not for long. They're taken to a field and told to run for freedom while Mayan warriors shower them with spears and arrows.
Somehow, Jaguar clears the gauntlet and races into the jungle toward home and his family, with a band of angry, tattooed spear throwers hot on his trail and a tropical storm brewing overhead.
Is Gibson making some kind of comment about the inhumanity of non-Christian cultures - first the Jews, now the Mayans? "Apocalypto" suggests that the pagans are about to be tamed, if not have their souls saved, by Gibson's Catholic forebears rowing ashore from the Nina, Pinta and Santa Maria.
More and more, Gibson's personality problems seem beyond the scope of movie reviews.
In any case, "Apocalypto" is the real deal as a jungle thriller. Its digital cinematography is gorgeous, its makeup and costumes are stunning, and its mostly nonpro cast - speaking in obscure Yucatec and translated with subtitles - is as authentic as the jungle of Veracruz where the film was shot.
Now that "Apocalypto" is being seen, four months after Gibson's arrest and tirade in Malibu, some in the media are asking whether Hollywood can forgive him by bestowing an Oscar.
What an ironic possibility! This is a movie dedicated to bloodlust (forget the gods, can the audience's thirst be sated?) and not the sort of thing Academy voters typically honors with awards.
An Oscar would not be forgiveness; it would be blindness.
Hey, I had to close my eyes during BraveHeart, and I have NOT watched the Passion, and I don't expect to go to this movie.
I was just commenting on how the writer "excused" Braveheart and the Passion because they were historical, and wondering if he was saying that this WASN'T historically accurate.
I'm not a big fan of blood and gore, even for historical purposes. I don't watch beheadings on the internet either, and I can't watch unedited images from 9/11 with people jumping to their deaths.
THAT WAS THE CULTURE OF THE PEOPLE OF CENTRAL AMERICAN before the "evil white man arrived." It was not pretty. The "native american" cultures were brutal. tyrannical and stone-aged...
Ping to Guennie. Here is the first review I have seen and the reviewer shares our opinion.
This movie is probably a real good depiction of how savage these people were.
Newly published research shows that Indian hunters in California decimated bird populations and ate some species into extinction.
In a report certain to cause California hippy heads to explode, archaeologist Jack M. Broughton wrote that from 2,600 to at least 700 years ago, native people hunted some species to local extinction, and wildlife returned to "fabulous abundances" only after European diseases decimated Indian populations starting in the 1500s.
Broughton combed through an ancient Indian garbage dump on the shores of San Francisco Bay over a seven year period and found significant bird population declines.
Broughton, from the University of Utah, says his study challenges “a common perception about ancient Native Americans as healthy, happy people living in harmony with the environment. That clearly was not always the case. Depending on when and where you look back in time, native peoples were either living in harmony with nature or eating their way through a vast array of large-sized, attractive prey species.”
I guess you didn't see the widely acclaimed and richly rewarded movie of "Schlinder's List" by Spielberg...it got pretty close to that in many scenes...
Wonder if the person who wrote this is Pro-Choice?
In general, more native Americans where hostile to people not of there tribe or tribal association then neutral or friendly. The great European invasion on balance did more to bring humanity to North America through trade, large scale agriculture and peaceful monotheism than the existing eye for an eye justice, slash and burn agriculture or wandering existence could have ever of accomplished.
My theory is that not only is Gibson fascinated with violence, but he also gets a kick out of luring people who otherwise wouldn't see a violent movie to watch his stuff.
First we had "Braveheart" and "The Patriot", which got a whole bunch of conservatives into the theaters to watch his stuff. (And I was one of them, although the violence in "The Patriot" repulsed me, and it was NOT historically accurate.) Then he made "The Passion," and got millions of Christians into the theaters to be traumatized by the violence he showed in exquisite detail.
Now he is done with excuses pretty much, but his talk about "human sacrifice" in Iraq sort of makes me think he is after the crunchy granola anti-violence crowd.
There is something wrong with him, and it is starting to show on his face. He needs some sort of help, and no one is apparently (until this reviewer) prepared to tell him that he is not playing with a full deck.
"My theory is that not only is Gibson fascinated with violence, but he also gets a kick out of luring people who otherwise wouldn't see a violent movie to watch his stuff."
Humandkind is violent and violent at any point in history.
I plan to see it and make up my own mind.
Quite true. However, we are supposed to try to overcome this as civilized people, not wallow in it.
I visited Tikal in Guatemala and got the same lecture I think. For such an 'advanced' civilization they certainly had a strong bloodlust, and the practice of human sacrifice was commonplace.
Oh, and they were long gone by the time the Spanish arrived.
The Europeans also brought Christianity.
Yes they were very big into the calendar and timekeeping. Some of their temples are laid out to track the years, i.e. when is the solstice. I'm sure they would have known an eclipse was coming.
It's a rip-off of A CONNECTICUTT YANKEE IN KING ARTHUR'S COURT!
You said: "Only White Christians are prone to violence and hate."
As opposed to say, Muslims who are the religion of peace.
Have seen both "Apocalypto" and "Nativity". The latter was very dull. Mel's film is fantastic, easily the best film I've seen in 10 years.
The so-called "ancestors" who are screaming racism over "Apocalypto" describe Mayans as if they were Hare Krishnas. It is just ridiculous. It was one of the most brutal savage regimes in human history. Unfortunately for these liars, the Mayans also carved their own brutality in stone for history to see.
What about "One Night with the King"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.