This is great news if true and I appreciate GP publishing it. I just wish Jim Hoft would learn to write clearly or hire an editor because almost everything he writes is convoluted, confusing, and consequently failst to make or obscures the fac the he is making the promised point. I just always dread clicking on GP posts. And almost never am I diappointed in my anticipation of diappointment.
For instance the article suggests Jack Smith violated a law and provides a hyperlink which leads back to the article rather than to the actual statute he violated or a discussion of how he violated the law. This is unpardonable. And then you go on and get to a link in the middle of the text that is spam advertising. Now I get it he needs advertising revenue, but he controls where on the page the advert appears and he should make sure that it is offset in a text box so that the reader is not confused about whether it is part of the text he is trying - often bootlessly when JH is the author - to understand or some other distraction besides the distractions contained in JH’s own bad writing.