Posted on 05/11/2024 5:19:14 AM PDT by Twotone
There's been another internal email leak from a Pfizer ‘whistleblower’ to top off the testimony from Pfizer reps to Senator Malcolm Roberts at a recent Senate hearing in Australia. I tend to be more persuaded by the latter, but confirmations are always valuable. Click on the photo below to hear the Pfizer reps admit to this, and interestingly, what they say is almost verbatim what is written in the ‘internal email’.
Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccines specifically for the employee vaccination program. Theroux and Hewitt - Pfizer reps. (Forgive me if the names are mis-spelled.)
Here’s a screenshot of the ‘Whistleblower’ email. Source: https://slaynews.com/news/pfizer-whistleblower-leaks-email-separate-covid-shots-employees/.
The vaccine doses to be used for this program are separate and distinct from those committed by Pfizer to governments around the world and will not impact supply to national governments in any way. Pfizer ‘Whistleblower’
Well, that’s a relief. At least us employees in the ‘program’ won’t be diggin’ into the other government-mandated doses. Phew.
What exactly do they mean by separate and distinct? Separate, I can understand. Don’t want to take someone else’s precious shot - you know, favoritism is not allowed in government. But distinct? Huh? How are they distinct? Exactly? Exactly.
Let's repeat this really clearly.
Separate shots for 'employees'. This necessarily means one of two things: that there were batches that were less harmful than others, or that there were known placebo batches (saline injections - and I mean, true saline injections that would be harmless).
If the former is true, that there is known variation between batches (whatever this means), then the batches were designed this way. If THIS is true, then we have intent on our hands. I still have trouble imagining that they would be capable of varying at will or by demand in a way that would ever be predictably variably harmful. I mean, it seems to me that the manufacturing practices themselves were simply ridiculous in their bug-duggery (think DNA:RNA hybrids/contamination), so if we accept this as reality, how can we accept that they tailored batches to be variably harmful? Perhaps only some of them had the SV40 built into their plasmids for modified mRNA production? I don’t know.
Craig Pardekooper has been devout about batches having variable harms, and I have been writing about this for years now to try to understand the mechanisms by which this might be possible. And of course, there is the excellent study published by Schmeling et al. that reinforces that different batches are more highly-associated with serious adverse events, but still. How?
Could it be the people who make the difference? Genetic variations in ACE-2 receptors? Again, I don’t know for sure.
In any case, I believe that these 'reserved batches' for the Aussie employees were likely saline injections. As in, true saline injections.
After years of many of us trying to crack this egg, please pass on the gravity of this potential reality to whomever is interested in listening.
If there is variable toxicity in these batches of COVID-19 shots, this would also provide an explanation for the variability in AE and SAE presentations. It is very likely however, that other factors are at play. I want to stress this. Variability in harms also comes down to differences in the actual people injected, and most importantly, not only what they were injected with, but how, and if, the contents of the syringe were ‘cloudy’ or ‘clumpy’ or ‘degraded’ or etc...
I am sorry to hear about your father, but how could you have been jabbed in 2020 in order to see him when the Covid jabs were not available for anyone in the general public until early 2021?
We should be demanding to see the aggregate health data of all Pfizer employees and contractors and compare this to a similar size group of people, such as the employees of a large health system, who were mandated to get the jabs to see if there are any statistically significant differences.
“NONE of them got the real shot both parties. They all got saline shots.”
Plus, a few months ago it was leaked that many were given ivermectin.
I’m so sorry that happened to you. That stupid Covid BS and shots caused a lot of rifts between family and friends.
I’m grateful that it didn’t affect any of my relationships that way, but I have friends who were banned from family gatherings for being unvaxxed and those divisions have not been mended.
I wonder if there are any cases of vax-takers apologizing to people they treated badly and admitting that they might have been wrong?
As a Veteran, we had them early at the VA. They were vaccinating Vets at the front of the line, before anyone else they deemed expendable.
We’re the usual ‘Guinea Pigs’ for this kind of stuff. :(
Everyday Flu Shots, Covid BS19, Shingles Shots - whatever Big Pharma is currently pimping...
I’ve refused everything offered except for the CovidBS-19 shot because those were desperate times for my family.
Again. You and your fellow lemmings bought into all the crap directives from the CDC that proved to be useless like masking, social distancing, and lockdowns.
wildcard_redneck wrote: “Again. You and your fellow lemmings bought into all the crap directives from the CDC that proved to be useless like masking, social distancing, and lockdowns.”
You have no proof that I supported masking, social distancing and lockdowns. My posts on FR have focused upon the refuting the anti-vaxxer false claims about the vaccines.
To: conservative98
conservative98 wrote: “Today, I set the record straight on ivermectin. The FDA is pushing dangerous lies about safety concerns of effective treatments while approving expensive, ineffective treatments that actually have safety concerns. This is the ultimate blood libel, and it's leading to needless death and illness.”Why do some make such a big deal out of the EUA for the vaccines but seem fully satisfied to take veterinarian grade Ivermectin which isn't approved for human consumption?
3 posted on 08/23/2021 3:50:00 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3988120/replies?c=3
wildcard_redneck wrote: “Again. You and your fellow lemmings bought into all the crap directives from the CDC that proved to be useless like masking, social distancing, and lockdowns.” #47 this thread.
wildcard_redneck wrote: “Here is a comment of yours where you back the clot shot and compare ivermectin to horse medicine which it is not.”
This post of yours does not show that I supported ‘masking, social distancing, and lockdowns’.
My posts have focused on the inaccurate anti-vaxxer narrative that the vaccines are dangerous and ineffective and the inaccurate information that safe and effective alternatives such as invermectin exist. Unless you can produce ‘gold standard’ (peer reviewed, placebo, randomized studies) there is no need to further the myth that ivermectin is safe and effective.
I particularly focus on such myths that the vaccines have resulted in a surge of young athletes dying suddenly from cardiac issues which the data shows that such deaths have decreased.
As to your last sentence: FALSE.
I just had a friend from elementary school, mid-50s & healthy, die last week. Heart. Died in sleep.
I have a half dozen ppl around me suffering various AEs after the Pfizer jab. Neighbor landlord has sudden onset stage 3 very rare cancer. She & husband both vxd, both initially supported the cv19vx, and now both blame it. A former colleague now has serious blood clots. He was the most jabbed person in his office.
SecAmndmt wrote: “As to your last sentence: FALSE.”
The death of your friend is regretable however:
My claim was that the data shows there has been no surge in the deaths of young athletes dying suddenly from cardiac issues and that the data shows that such deaths have decreased.
But the vaxxer's false claims about the vaccines are ok.
You're not fooling anyone.
Augie wrote: “But the vaxxer’s false claims about the vaccines are ok.”
Please be more specific.
Please be more specific.
That they are safe and effective comes to mind immediately.
Augie wrote: “That they are safe and effective comes to mind immediately.”
“A Commonwealth Fund study estimates that, through November 2022, COVID-19 vaccines prevented more than 18.5 million US hospitalizations and 3.2 million deaths and saved the country $1.15 trillion.”
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/report-covid-19-vaccines-saved-us-115-trillion-3-million-lives
Tell that to the dead ones.
Augie wrote: “Tell that to the dead ones.”
The anti-vaxxers have created a narrative that the vaccines are dangeous and ineffective to justify their predisposition to decline vaccination. This has been true throughout history.
The first vaccines were said to be filled with bat feces and would change people into cows. Now, the narrative is the vaccines are deadly and will change your DNA. IOW, the same argument for over 400 years.
FR has many posters spreading the anti-vaxxer narrative. Rather than trusting some anonymous posters on the internet, go to some reputable and credible sources. Hint: Kirsh, McCullough, Infowars, are not included. Almost all the anti-vaxxers quoted on FR are profiting from selling snake oil.
One further comment. When you read on FR things like deaths of young athletes have surged since the vaccines, verify that by searching. Same thing about claims that ivermectin is better than the vaccines. See what other sources say.
ALL of the big Pharma you are pushing are profiting from the dangerous and ineffective frankenshot, you government hack.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.