Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia's message to Britain
Israel National News ^ | 5/7/24 | Staff

Posted on 05/08/2024 4:16:43 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal

Russia is threatening to strike British military facilities and has started practicing the use of nuclear weapons.

A threatening statement released by the Kremlin stated that "British military facilities may be targeted" by the Russian army. A similar threat was also directed at France.

The threats from Russia come after statements by French President Emmanuel Macron and British Foreign Secretary David Cameron, who expressed support for Ukraine's right to use British weapons in the war with Russia, and Macron did not rule out the possibility of deploying French troops to assist Ukraine in the war.

In addition, the Kremlin announced the start of military exercises involving the use of nuclear weapons, in response to the statements of Macron and David Cameron. British and French ambassadors in Russia were summoned for clarification at the Russian Foreign Ministry, where they were informed that Russia sees France and Britain as being "de facto" involved in the war.

"Nigel Casey was warned that in response to Ukrainian attacks on Russian territory with British weapons, all British facilities and military equipment in Ukraine and outside it may become a target. The ambassador was asked to reflect on the catastrophic inevitable consequences of such hostile steps from London, and to unequivocally refute the provocative and inflammatory statements of the British Foreign Office in the most decisive and unequivocal manner," stated in the Kremlin's announcement.

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Government; Society
KEYWORDS: donateforjim; greatbritain; nato; russia; wefwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Roman_War_Criminal

“deploying French troops”

I think I read those would be along the border with Belarus to free up Ukrainian troops for active fighting with Russia.


21 posted on 05/08/2024 6:04:08 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

True, as far as it goes. I fear though that the wishful thinking and moral confusion of the US and NATO are not being remedied.


22 posted on 05/08/2024 6:07:40 PM PDT by Rockingham (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

If you mean as in fixed, or repaired, I doubt that we can return to the past on that, but for all those years I was desperate to stop or at least slow the decay of Western militaries and allies I am grateful for the huge improvements that are taking place from Russia launching this war.


23 posted on 05/08/2024 6:13:23 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

If Russia did that, both the UK and US have means to retaliate in kind. It’s a moot point though, you would have to be crazy to launch missiles at another nuclear power.


24 posted on 05/08/2024 6:13:52 PM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

If Russia attacks NATO then NATO will have to defend itself.


25 posted on 05/08/2024 6:18:42 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp
Russia is a state sponsor of proxy wars, sabotage, and terrorism - unchanged since Lenin gained power.

OMG!

There you go again. The pot calling the kettle black.

Ever heard of proxy wars like.....
-Ukraine
-Vietnam
-Syria
-Afghanistan
-Iraq
-Libyia

Not to mention the constant "color revolutions" we've launched to destroy one country after another and murder their leaders all across the globe. We've accomplished all of this while racking up debts that our great, great grandchildren will be dealing with. And at the same time, we've got people in our own country living in tent cities and sh**#t-hole cities that are worse than third-world countries.

Look in a mirror.

26 posted on 05/08/2024 6:39:03 PM PDT by icclearly ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

You mean like the Russians did during Vietnam?

I still don’t understand why we didn’t obliterate Iran for their conduct during our time in Iraq.


27 posted on 05/08/2024 7:00:16 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Williams
"Russia will be incinerated if it attacks NATO. Get Russia the hell out of Ukraine."

A lot of dim bulbs don't realize that Russia has a larger nuclear missile arsenal than we do and that they also have hypersonic missiles that we do not. Are they really dumb enough to realize that a nuclear war would incinerate both countries?

28 posted on 05/08/2024 7:00:35 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
"I was desperate to stop or at least slow the decay of Western militaries and allies I am grateful for the huge improvements that are taking place from Russia launching this war."

Yeah, like YOU could do one damned thing about it. Sheesh, what a moronic thing to write.

29 posted on 05/08/2024 7:03:38 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

You are always trolling.


30 posted on 05/08/2024 7:14:10 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

Yeah, and you have to be kind of crazy to have your proxies start shooting your equipment at targets -inside- Russia. Seriously, if some British missile hits the victory day parade and kills 100 people, are the Kerch bridge gets dropped, let’s say Russia then hits a British base, or drops London bridge, or sinks a British carrier. What would be our response? The British army has a grand total of 75,000 men, about 100,000 including reserves. And they have less than 200 tanks. Our military has been decimated by 2 decades of chasing Apaches and faggotry and woke.

Do you think we would try to engage Russia in a conventional war? With our pasty soft and female soldiers? Do you think we would use nukes? Because the minute we do… It goes all out. What do you think the response would be if Russia does strike back if France or NATO hits a serious blow inside Russia, even by proxy. People bring up Vietnam a lot, and both sides do supply weapons. But what would we have done in 1969 if Russia found a way on behalf of the Vietnamese for some proxy to conduct air strikes inside the United States? They’re really hasn’t been anything quite like this in anybody’s past.

Not with nukes. I think the lunatics in DC think they can have a congressional war with Russia, keep it conventional, and force Putin out of office.

Look at the background of our national security leaders. There’s that woman academic. There’s a Jake Sullivan that was nothing but a political hack with no security background. When we bring up the Cold War, we need to remember there were some very professional people on our side at that time. Not today.


31 posted on 05/08/2024 7:29:43 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. and hopes they could forc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Ok, I’ll bite. What did you actually do to stop or at least slow the decay of Western militaries and allies? I really, really want to know Ansel.


32 posted on 05/08/2024 7:39:50 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

Is that what you really think that rushed sentence was saying?

Now you want to do a big troll bunch of posting and pretending over a simple awkward wording that is absolutely meaningless?

Why not respond instead to the substance of my posts, it makes more interesting reading for a thread.


33 posted on 05/08/2024 7:47:36 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I was desperate to stop or at least slow the mental decay of militant morons and Zeepers and I am grateful for the huge improvements that are taking place from Russia launching this war.


34 posted on 05/08/2024 7:53:46 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

That didn’t make any sense, but it sure sounded childish.

Your entire posting on this thread is going to be the usual nasty, angry trolling it looks like.


35 posted on 05/08/2024 7:56:55 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
"That didn’t make any sense, but it sure sounded childish."

I see that you finally got the point I was making.

36 posted on 05/08/2024 8:02:20 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

He may not even believe what he posts.


37 posted on 05/08/2024 8:42:59 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: ansel12
I agree. My fear though is that the US and other Western societies have lost a clear appreciation of the nature of war and that victory requires a desire to kill and destroy on a wide scale.

Genuine warriors are a rare and sometimes troublesome breed. Even our military often now seems to shun them. If we get in a shooting war, we may not have the time though to find, recruit, and train the warriors we will need for victory. I have a distressing image of entire battalions of American soy boys who are politically correct and know the DEI mantra and have the best weapons -- but who are whining and crying and hiding from combat because they are not willing and eager to kill and be killed.

39 posted on 05/09/2024 2:11:48 AM PDT by Rockingham (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

NATO troops are far better trained and equipped than Ukrainian ones, and actually have air forces that aren’t relying on old Soviet junk. Despite all that, Ukraine is holding out against Russia’s ‘3 day special military operation’ for over 2 years now.

I don’t really understand why people are so scared of Putin’s puffing and blowing. Where nukes are concerned, MAD applies, conventionally, Russia is way overmatched by the US alone, never mind NATO collectively. The military may well have been infested by LGBTQWERTYUIOP BS, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t plenty of warriors still in the military who know what they are doing.

I will tell you what would be potentially dangerous for global conflict and nuclear escalation though, letting Ukraine fall unsupported after they voluntarily surrendered the nuclear weapons on their territory under the Budapest Memorandum in 1994, which obligates the US and UK, as well as Russia, to stand up for Ukraine’s territorial integrity (russia obviously failed to live up to their side of the bargain).

Failing to fulfil those treaty obligations will tell every scumbag regime on the planet as well as every small nation with a powerful hostile neighbor that nukes are the only path to national security, because the US and the west aren’t going to have their back.

So that would mean Saudi Arabia, with its wahhabist population, getting nukes, Bangladesh, Egypt, Turkey, Eastern European countries, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Phillipines, Japan, South Korea all scrambling to acquire nuclear weapons and the more countries have them, especially the unstable ones, the more likely there will be a nuclear war happening eventually.

Russia has to pay for what they are doing in Ukraine, and they are doing, and they have to because if they don’t it won’t end there.


40 posted on 05/09/2024 3:38:05 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson