They will just appoint more guys like Barr who talk about how weaponized it is after they are no longer in where they could have done something.
Biden’s Solicitor General’s “obstruction” argument to the court seemed to serve a dual purpose:
<><>to placate the court’s concerns that the govt’s reading of Section 1512(c)(2) is overbroad
<><>and to convince the justices that the DOJ applies the obstruction statute “uniformly.”
Yet, judging by the questions and responses from the bench,
from Gorsuch, a majority of the justices remained unconvinced.
Far from establishing that the Biden DOJ enforces Section 1512(c)(2) uniformly,
<><>his solicitor general’s argument painted a far different picture
<><>that the Biden admin acted solely in its own interests
<><>that it enlarged or contracted statutory language at will
<><>altering the law in obeisance to leftists’ self-serving political purposes of the moment.