Posted on 04/03/2024 7:59:23 AM PDT by Sam77
It’s been nearly two years since Matt Walsh’s documentary “What Is a Woman?” came out - and the question still remains unanswered by the gender ideology.
Charlie Kirk was debating college students, when a woman who presented herself as a feminist introduced. Kirk asked her the still-unanswered “what is a woman question?” - and was immediately met by hostility.
Rather than answer the question, the student tried to question Kirk’s motives for asking it, and said that he was trying to get her caught in a “gotcha” question. Of course, the question is only a “gotcha” to those who can’t answer the extremely simple question.
(Excerpt) Read more at bongino.com ...
Not fair. He’s a pro. She’s a ditz. It will never make it on the MSM. A minute and a half is too much for the left’s attention span.
I am not sure either, but it seems like a woman is a man without a penis and also has a larger part of the brain devoted to emotional responses, of course a woman also has the ability to procreate and lactate which men are lacking
.
There are three categories of humans; women, men, and marginal freaks. That is all.
The simple answer is if you think that you are a female then you are a woman. I don’t see why gender advocates have so much trouble answering the question. Maybe because it makes them sound crazy.
Ideology more important than survival. Key lesson for modern progressives.
Charlie Kirk loses it in debate when asked “What’s a grifter?”
He should have first asked...”What is a feminist?”
It's a loyalty test.
A while back, a Freeper (can’t remember who), said something to this effect:
“These days, being woman is simply a costume one can put on.”
Each day it gets easier though, and now it is only necessary to say that you are a woman (or a man), or even think it.
Reality has no significance anymore.
How is this hard?
The answer to “why do you want to know?” Is “why won’t you answer the question.?” We are not afraid to answer the question. We do not fear the results of our answer. They do. They are afraid of the backlash from their side. Therefore they refuse to answer the question because they are transphobic. The left always accuses you of what they are. They are transphobic therefore they constantly accuse us of it. Pretty simple really.
Yes, we have been post reality for a while now.
A Supreme Court justice wouldn’t answer that question.
Feminists are advocates for feminine people ?
That is inherently ridiculous.
Then would put feminists at odds with advocates of masculine people , of which there aren’t any.
Just to be clear from the beginning, I am 100% opposed to both homosexuality and to transgenderism.
I believe it is primarily the LGBTQIP+ folks, the ones who claim that there are 8 billion genders, who are pigeonholing our young children into three categories, straight, gay, and transgender. Preferably, in their minds, either gay or transgender. Yet we know that here are not 8 billion genders. There are two. There are not 8 billion sexes. There are two. But there are 8 billion personalities.
However, those of us who understand biology and are not afraid to boldly state the obvious, are also guilty of pigeonholing our young children whenever we assume a young boy who likes ballet must be gay, or a young girl who prefers the rough and tumble of football must be a lesbian.
Not all men are like John Wayne, and not all women are like Audrey Hepburn. Almost all of us have personalities that are some mix of both the masculine and the feminine. We all lean more one way or the other, and in our own particular ways, but we're still either men or women. And there's nothing wrong with that.
We need people with all sorts of personalities.
Using boys who like ballet as an example, what's wrong with that? If there are no boys in ballet, who will do the lifts? Why do we assume that a boy who likes ballet must be sexually and romantically interested in men? There are, in fact, a significant percentage of male ballet dancers who are married to women and have children. And I'll bet there are a lot of naturally heterosexual male ballet dancers who were brainwashed into homosexuality, simply because of their interest in an art form we consider to be more feminine.
BTW, the P in LGBTQIP+ stands for Pedophile. I think we need to start putting it in there.
So then the question is, what makes a person feminine or masculine? How is it defined or determined?
That fact is only hard to accept by God deniers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.