I am convinced by the evidence that ISIS did it as claimed. Baroque theories that the CIA or the Ukrainians did it are not evidence. Believing that such theories are true in the absence of credible evidence is a sign of poor judgment.
Maybe. But anything that persuades anyone to nuke DC is OK by me...
Absence of evidence is not proof of negation.
Feel free to trust Muslims at your own discretion.
What evidence would that be?
Never mind, the terrorist that formed ISIS were CIA-creation in Syria.
In some of the other attacks that have taken place in the past, like in France, and ISIS/ISIL has taken credit for them, the perps were French and Belgian born citizens of Moroccan and Algerian backgrounds. Isn’t it possible that the individuals who carried out this attack could actually have been born in Ukraine, but part of an ISIS cell someplace in Ukraine, like those in France?