No, you’re wrong. The word “image” doesn’t mean “precise duplication.” If it did, then humankind would be the Creator of the universe.
Understanding the distinction between Creator and creation is critical here.
Meanwhile, you suggest the concept of evil is not objective, and then you go on to use it as though it is objective. Maybe you don’t understand what I mean?
Since the foundation of your argument appears to be scripture (meaning, the Old and New Testaments), you should be aware that Genesis 1:26 says “image and likeness.” That is duplication.
There is an assumption – a logical one – that someone or something must be the original Creator; in other words, the universe, life, etc. did not just develop spontaneously; there had to be a source, a catalyst.
But, you run into trouble when you assign actions to someone or something that you have no evidence are responsible for those actions.
If your premise assumes that God did indeed create the universe; what is your evidence of that? Is it that same scripture? Which was written by Man? Scripture is a wealth of contradictions. If your God is the God of scripture, you have a lot of explaining to do.
There are other religions and beliefs that claim that THEIR deities created the universe, or life, or both; and do not assert that Man was created in the image and likeness of their deities. You assume that your claim is the right one. So, trot out your proof of that, as well.
Because, as has been said by philosophers and scientists for millennia, a claim that can be made without evidence and can be dismissed without evidence. If your evidence is scripture, then you are in trouble.
In summary: Your belief may be right for YOU; it does not mean that it is FACT, or is right for others.