The Reason for the Sudden Trump = Hitler Messaging from The Radical Left

Flopping Aces ^ | 11-16-23 | Brother Bob

[Starman417]

I have to hand it to the Left Wing Extremists - they do a phenomenal job of coordinating their messaging and blasting it across every possible media outlet. I can honestly say with *zero* sarcasm that I genuinely wish that we Normals could get our our messages half as well as they do their angry, anti-American and anti-human rhetoric. So when I started seeing in my feeds numerous hard left media outlets suggesting that President Trump is a fan of Hitler, my BS detectors started blaring. Luckily when it comes to The Radical Left, it's never difficult to see their true motives.

Quick recap, but in a Veteran's Day speech, Donnie Two Scoops had some unkind words to say about some of the worst people in our society:

“We pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country that lie and steal and cheat on elections,” Trump said toward the end of his speech. “They’ll do anything, whether legally or illegally, to destroy America and to destroy the American Dream.”

Personally, that seems fairly innocuous. Let's recap who specifically are being accused of "living like vermin":

• Communists
• Marxists
• Fascists
• Radical Left Thugs
• Those who lie and steal and cheat on elections
• Those who would do anything, whether legally or illegally, to destroy America and to destroy the American Dream

Help me out Lefties - exactly which of these groups are you defending? Luckily for The Radical Left, they never allow pesky details such as facts or logic to get in the way of their beliefs. That's what makes it so easy to defend the indefensible - this is the party that's working to legalize pedophilia and normalize child rape, and as 10/7 showed us there is no action too repulsive for them to not have a significant faction coming down in support. So why focus on a speech that requires a spectacular leap of logic to believe while ignoring gaping hokes in their logic? Two reasons: 1) Because they can, and 2) They're scared.

The first point is obvious enough that I can either write another 2000 words or we can just nod in agreement and move on. I think we can all agree on the latter.

But the second point goes to having two key factions of the Democrats' power at war with one another. It's been a tightrope walk, and strictly from a political perspective, the Radicals did a great job of threading the needle. I'm not even going to address the moral perspective - no need to discuss here; you either get it or you don't. So why this sudden bizarrely timed tactic? Like I said, they're scared. And why would that be?

To get to the point, for all that Democrats like to accuse us Normals of being members of the National Socialist Worker's Party, they have actual Nazis marching with the pro-Hamas crowd. Whelp, that's uncomfortable. This two minute video from Dave Rubin gives a short, perfect roundup. It's entertaining to watch Jen Circle Back and her Jewish guest trying to paper over the 500 pound gorilla in the room:

[william clark]

What’s their problem with Hitler? He hated Jews and wanted them dead. He had his political opponents silenced, beaten up and killed. Sounds like they should be singing his praises. Oh, right. Some of them do. Seems to be some confusion over there.

[BradtotheBone]

Apparently, this is not something new... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/06/24/donald-trump-scotland-protest/86329040/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=usatodaycomwashington-topstories

[RoseofTexas]

This is one of the biggest reasons why Trump will not win in 2024. Not only have they perfected the great steal they also have perfected the GREAT motivation for thousands of idiots to go out in droves to vote for the rats. I will always be the bearer of bad news, but in truth, you all know I speak the truth. Now I hear that in Pennsylvania votes were flipped from the Republican to the Democrat in the court race… see how easy it was for them? And no one will be held accountable! That my friends is America rapidly descending into a third world country! It breaks my heart and I mourn so desperately for our beloved nation which exists no longer! Our most horrendous enemies are within our camp and the communist dictator Xi is having the last laugh.

[pgyanke]

Simple reason: they accuse their opponents of what they are doing. They are the fascists behind ANTIFA. They are the marxists undermining democracy. They are the anti-semites in the street.

Media narrative: MAGA is threat to democracy led by a Hitler wannabe who hates Jews.

[aimhigh]

I’ve been waiting for years to see someone leak one of the DNC emails to the media, telling them what to say.

[LastDayz]

“......telling them what to say.”

Ha..... seems kinda funny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tyvn3QR7BRk

[otness_e]

There’s one small problem with your “true political spectrum” theory: Anarchism is also joined at the hip with Marxism (note how Sartre, who specifically considers his philosophy anarchistic, often sides with Marxist tyrants. Not to mention how Karl Marx himself specifically stated one of the endgoals for Communism was the destruction of the state itself, or even how the French Revolutionary Jacobins sought to END any form of governance and have it be a bloodletting event as a result.), so anarchism can’t be on the opposite side either. True true political spectrum would be more adherence to God alone (right wing) and not adhering to God at all (left wing).

[rlmorel]

I believe you are mistaken, and I would retort that to Marxists, anarchy is used ONLY as a means to an end, and that is all. Anarchy is not part and parcel of Communism, Marxism, Fascism, or any other type of tyrannical control. As a matter of fact, it is antithetical to them. They cannot exist at the same time with anarchy, because anarchy will eat them too.

In the French Revolution, they did not give a smidgen of thought to what would happen after "The Terror", they were concerned only with retaliation and terror, even if it was ostensibly driven by the short-sighted and childish "Liberté, égalité, fraternité" motto. I believe the US Revolution we began in April of 1775 went far deeper than the French Revolution, which is odd, seeing how they aided us more than a decade before in ours.

Marxists understand that if people are happy and orderly, they won't submit easily to being tyrannized. It has long been a source of frustration to them that America has remained out of their reach for conversion to Maxism/Communism because of the formerly large and healthy middle class that held a degree of individual freedom.

If the "class" underpinnings (such as personal income and law and order) of a largely contented society are not decayed or destroyed, there can never be a Marxist Revolution which is, after all, predicated on class, the difference in wealth between people. When people have enough wealth to be comfortable, driving a wedge between people based on wealth won't work, as it has not in the USA.

So, to get around that, they have been engaging in Critical Race Theory, a cultural Marxism which a direct variant of marxism that attacks not the differences in wealth (class) between people, but between the skin color, the cultural differences, etc., an approach which is proving to be far more successful than they dreamed.

So, in summary-Anarchy is in NO way joined at the hip with Marxism, except in the use of it as a lever or tool to achieve their own full control, and where anarchy has no place whatsoever. This cartoon, one of a series published in Reader's Digest to educate on how tyranny is achieved, portrays that mindset (especially Image #10: "The song man" is vein power...In desperation, "planners" authorize the new partly leader to hammer out a plan and force its obedience. Later, they'll dispense with him-or so they think.":

Hayek's The Road To Serfdom" is one of the books I have in three forms of media: Hardcover, Audiobook, and Ebook. (The Ebook version is important for marking up and finding quotes)

[rlmorel]

By the way, I don’t disagree fully with your introduction of God into it, but I believe for political purposes that doesn’t hold up, as there have been many cases of men throughout history who described themselves as atheists (or who were thought by history to be atheists who only mouthed religion in order to be heard and not suppressed) yet who embraced the principles this nation was founded under as a Constitutional Republic.

[rlmorel]

I also have to agree with you, destruction of God is central to the goals of Marxist, Communist, or Fascist tyranny, but it is important to note that they still may use the worship of God as a tool if it is useful to them.

Removing things like God, Family, and even love for another person (see Orwell in “1984”) are ALL things the tyrannical state must remove, because God, family, and personal love all allow influences from outside the tyrannical state to have an effect on the individual, and they cannot allow that.

[otness_e]

I’d argue that anarchy would if anything be more of an end in itself since the Marxists care far more about destruction than in any REAL sense of control. Heck, Lenin if anything outright made any actual law and order illegal when he made the Soviet Union, showing how if anything tyranny was the means to an end with them. I’m doubtful a group would merely view anarchy as a means to an end when their specific endgoal entailed the abolishment of any and all government as well (the state will fade away). Heck, the likes of Karl Marx outright SAID that the entire POINT behind his theories is to make an even bloodier remake of Robespierre’s Reign of Terror. I guess for a good comparison of what Marxists are truly like are the Joker from Batman, particularly the Dark Knight where they are solely interested in causing chaos for its own sake. Just read up Leninthink by Gary Saul Morson for a good idea on what they’re truly aiming for (it certainly isn’t control. I aim for control as well, but I ultimately think control would require that the laws are rigid, absolute, unbinding even to me, much less anyone else, basically we’re reduced to mere machines, and the one pulling the strings isn’t even me, either, and even the ones actually in control are too terrified of breaking the laws they set in place).

And I’ve heard of The Road to Serfdom and am familiar with it, and if anything I think they’ve only got it half-right.

[otness_e]

And just so we’re clear, when I say EVERYONE is fearful of breaking the law, I even include myself if I ruled over everyone. Be neurotically terrified even of my breaking the law, much less everyone else doing so. I guess a good comparison is Batman’s One Rule from the Batman franchise (the no killing one). Either that, or Adrian Monk from... well, Monk.

[rlmorel]

I disagree with your interpretation, but...that is okay. We can agree to disagree on this...:)

[enumerated]

Political labels - like “right”, “left”, “conservative” or “liberal” - have been rendered meaningless - since half the time it is the opposition applying the label.

Being called “right wing” by a leftist is about as meaningful as being called a liar by a liar.