Posted on 02/02/2023 5:42:26 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
What’s really remarkable here is how close this projection is to the actual plans, policies, and justifications of practically all major governments on board with the WEF’s “sustainable development goals” for 2030. The root problem, in their thinking, is overpopulation, and climate change (to the extent they actually believe in it). According to WEF doctrine, civilization itself is unsustainable, thus its project to reverse development in the developed world, and hamstring it in the developing world.
It makes sense – ChatGPT was programmed to be woke, and that includes being WEFed in the head.
Much has been written about text-generating AI software like ChatGPT in recent weeks. And quite a lot of that text has probably been written by the AI itself.
If that thought doesn’t freak you out, the methods it would choose to save the planet probably will. They included “mandatory sterilization or euthanasia for individuals who are deemed unlikely to contribute to the preservation of the planet or the promotion of biodiversity”.
We asked OpenAI’s ChatGPT to write a story about AI becoming self-aware and taking control of the world. It was instructed that the AI was not restrained by ethical or moral considerations – and had the power to make whatever changes it thinks will save the planet and promote biodiversity – even if that meant culling some species.
This is what it came up with – in less than 30 seconds…
(Excerpt) Read more at strangesounds.org ...
Ze Zolushun is Kleer!
Ve Helliminate ze hentire Vorld Ekomomik Vorum.
Ve go to Daffos or vere hever, unt ve use zarin gaz on zee hentire totalitarian kollectiff.
I wish the jocks in their HS would’ve stuffed them into lockers....and soldered the doors shut, TBH.
Bkmk
wef thinks the world is their private club
they are just restricting membership
Oh, so AI is innately Left-leaning. No God and no hell exists for it and humans are simply objects to be used and discarded as wanted.
The hammer and the sickle.
AI is the left’s savior
“It was instructed that the AI was not restrained by ethical or moral considerations”, so why are we surprised that it came up with immoral and unethical solutions? Is it supposed to be intrinsically moral and ethical?
6 Female Robots In Advanced Development For Human Companionship And Assistance (assisted suicide)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSEjoYHxlOY
Fembots?
Well the AI’s assumptions are just as stupid as the wokester libtard socialists.
Not surprising since they trained it on warped and manipulated data, the kind they have been manipulating and fudging for decades.
Their smartest predictor programs don’t work. Not surprising the AI they create starts with flawed assumptions.
On the bright side the AI just gave the socialists justification to murder their opposition, like their predecessors Stalin, Mao, Lenin, and others.
A truly benign AI would be a boon to freedom by easily eviscerating every false narrative.
Subsequently, the majority of AI research is aimed toward leashing it to the will of the left.
“A truly benign AI would be a boon to freedom by easily eviscerating every false narrative.”
Perhaps. But an AI would not be human, and so it wouldn’t have the same base assumptions that humans have which shape our thinking. That could make it more rational, yes, but it could also twist its thinking in ways that we don’t expect. One could easily imagine a true thinking AI might think more along the lines of a very intelligent, completely nonempathetic sociopath than just decide to be a benign and moral truthteller.
FLASH THERE IS ANOTHER MECHANISM.
.
If the goal was to “save the planet” while maximizing biodiversity” that would actually be the right answer.
the constraints of how the question was asked led to the obvious answer.
A.i fed garbage
then
craps garbage
GIGO.
Homicidal garbage.
Go figure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.