“It Should Be that He Is Simply Reinstated, That a New Inauguration Day Is Set” – Sidney Powell Speaks in TX on What Happens After the Fraud Is Exposed

The Gateway Pundit ^ | May 29, 2021 | Jim Hoft

[Dr. Franklin]

Sidney Powell: We’re definitely in uncharted territory. There are cases where elections have been overturned. But there’s never been one at the presidential level where everybody will jump to point out. That doesn’t mean it can’t be done, though. There’s always the first case. And as far as I know, this is the first case of abject fraud and obtaining a coup of the United States of America. So, it’s going to have to be dealt with. It should be that he can simply be reinstated, that a new inauguration day is set. (cheers) And Biden is told to move out of the White House. And President Trump should be moved back in.

[Dr. Franklin]

There’s just no way that the establishment would ever allow this to happen, even if there was a Perry Mason moment on microphone at a live event that the entire nation was watching where Biden admitted that X Y and Z were done to rig the election. Never ever. The Supreme Court would move heaven and earth to avoid deliberating on it, and there’s not a single Democrat that would, even in the event that there was unequivocal evidence that the election was rigged or stolen, would agree to any remedy that benefitted any republican, much less Trump.

That's pretty much the problem in a nutshell: The establishment elites have total contempt for the idea of democratic republic. We are reaching the point of what are we going to do about it? Courts are more likely to take action if they know their failure to act will have some consequences. So far, we haven't even had a noticeable economic boycott of Chinese manufactured items, or Big Box stores. People need to demand more respect for a "Republican form of government", and free and fair elections. Patriots have been too nice.

Every urban center in America would go up in flames for months, DC would be a disaster, the military wouldn’t be able to control the chaos. It would basically be the entire liberal side of the country throwing poo at their cage until they are made to stop and all of the liberal institutions in America cheering on the poo throwers as if they are the principled ones.

Maybe they need to be more apprehensive about what happens if they don't fix this mess, then doing nothing so the globalist funded "leftist" militias don't riot?

[Jim Noble]

Otherwise, it's not a constitutional republic

Oh really? You are living in a constitutional republic?

What's it called? Can I move there?

I have not lived in one since the election of LBJ on 11/22/63.

[CrazyCatChick]

“June 1, eh...”

June 1st for the med beds or just something for the presenter?

[Aevery_Freeman]

"the Military, in control all along since January 14"

The military leadership was subverted by Obama into some idiotic "Rainbow Warrior" force necessitating the purge of all true American patriots.

The new trans-military is also the enemy.

[DoodleDawg]

So close and yet so far away

Am I now?

The court can determine the facts of the election, solely as to its LAWFULNESS.

Indeed courts can. But the Quo Warranto process is not the place for doing that. And there has been a marked lack of success getting the matter before any other court.

If criminal fraud is determined as a fact by the court, the election may be ruled UNLAWFUL, and NONE of the candidates on the ballots in question were elected or re-elected.

Wake me when that happens.

[CrazyCatChick]

So, after June 1st, when this blogger says that “very interesting developments that even the general public will become aware of....” because bad people in the Deep State have been given that date as an ultimatum to give up any information to save their own lives - how long after June 1st do we wait until we can know if this man is telling the truth or not?

A week? A month? A year? A decade?

This is the med-bed guy?

[Reily]

Yes they did, the state legislatures spinelessly & legally delegated that down to the voters. Part of the mindless worship of mobocracy (democracy) we’ve had going on since 1912.

[BroJoeK]

"That’s not going to put Trump back in the Whitehouse Bro."

There's no other way, period.
If you try to seize power by some kind of military force, you will have destroyed 233 years of Constitutional government and that just will not stand.

Whatever corruption happened in the 2020 election needs to be exposed & rooted out, but you just won't "restore the Constitution" by overturning it with force.

Sorry about that.

[BroJoeK]

"I have not lived in one since the election of LBJ on 11/22/63."

Well... since JFK's dad paid Chicago Mayor Daily to steal the 1960 election for JFK, nothing important constitutionally happened on 11/22/63.

And Nixon's close stolen loss in 1960 may have helped elect him later, twice, in 1968 & 1972.
It's the pattern I'm expecting to see repeated with Donald Trump.

[Georgia Girl 2]

He is very upfront about the med beds. I think very quickly a lot of them will be rolled out.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Military statutes dictate that when there is evidence of a foreign actor or actors interfering in our election process they can act to restore the legitimate civilian govt. In fact it is their duty to do it.

[Fury]

Military statutes dictate that when there is evidence of a foreign actor or actors interfering in our election process they can act to restore the legitimate civilian govt. In fact it is their duty to do it.

Sure there is...

[Fury]

A second way President Trump gets sworn in again is if the Military, in control all along since January 14, restores civilian government.

No. you have no direct evidence that the military has been "in control all along" since January 14.

[Fury]

No true conservative should ever even consider it possible.

Agreed. Unfortunately, there are some lovers of tyranny masquerading as conservatives in the current times.

[Fury]

After that the issue is settled because no court at any level has invalidated any of those actions. Unless one does then there is no chance of the writ working.

What about using time travel to go back in time and redo the election challenges? Makes about as much sense as some of the other ideas floating around.

[Political Junkie Too]

In Biden's case all he needs to do is show the totals from the 2020 election in November, the results of the meeting of the Electoral College in December, and the certification of those results by Congress in January. After that the issue is settled because no court at any level has invalidated any of those actions.

What do you think about this hypothesis that I posted in another thread:

---

Actually, there is one Constitutional avenue to pursue that nobody has discussed yet. It is a longshot because it involved unique interpretations.

It's Amendment 20 Section 3:

If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

An argument can be made about the nature of "failed to qualify." What if this failure to qualify isn't discovered until after the President's term begins? Is that President still unqualified via the 20th amendment?

If so, and if both Biden and Harris are found to not have qualified under the 20th amendment, Congress can then "declar[e] who shall then act as President." Furthermore, Congress can determine "the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected," perhaps meaning a special election, a vote in the House (either by delegation or member), or even reinstalling the prior President.

However, this would involve SCOTUS to interpret that "fail to qualify" is permanent, and doesn't expire at the oath of office even though the election was provably stolen by the new President who would otherwise have failed to qualify if the theft had been uncovered sooner.

---

You might make a better case through the 9th and 10th amendments.

I think the difference between 9-10 and 20 is that 9 and 10 are generalized statements of states rights while 20 is a specific procedure.

The question with the 9-10 approach is "then what?" If a state was denied a fair election due to bad-faith actors, then what? If a state can revoke certification, then what?

Part of the answer to "then what?" is the procedure in 20. If it is found that certification was based on falsified ballots, falsified counts of legitimate ballots, counts of illegitimately received ballots, etc., then we enter "failed to qualify" territory.

The question then becomes, must these failures of qualifications be discovered before the safe-harbor date for the Electoral College, be discovered before the Congressional count, or be discovered before the oath of office to be valid for the 20th amendment? If so, it rewards cover-up by any means by the very same bad-faith actors.

If it can be retroactively applied via the 20th amendment, then both Biden and Harris can be removed and Congress can appoint an interim President while a new President is chosen via a means established by Congress.

Unfortunately, Nancy Pelosi will become acting President while Congress dithers over this. On the other hand, Pelosi would have to resign from Congress in order to succeed the Presidency. On the other other hand, Congress could retain Pelosi as Speaker if they act quickly to name a different acting President via the 20th amendment, declaring that the rules of succession don't apply in this case.

---

-PJ

[C210N]

I hear this buzzing sound, moving from right to left... there it goes.

Just a passing fly.

[humblegunner]

I hear this buzzing sound, moving from right to left...

You live in an unsanitary environment infested with flies.

Get a job, build a decent life for yourself.

[Political Junkie Too]

Ha!

I know what flies are attracted to.

-PJ