Posted on 04/13/2021 5:45:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The NCAA Board of Governors issued a statement on Monday confirming explicitly that which it has only evidenced in the past by its decision-making — the NCAA will not schedule championship events in states that pass legislation ensuring that female athletes will be provided the opportunity to compete against other female athletes — not including “transgender” female athletes.
When determining where championships are held, NCAA policy directs that only locations where hosts can commit to providing an environment that is safe, healthy and free of discrimination should be selected. We will continue to closely monitor these situations to determine whether NCAA championships can be conducted in ways that are welcoming and respectful of all participants.
It has been mistakenly reported in various places that this announcement is the result of some states having empowered the NCAA to take this step by demonstrating a willingness to “cave-in” to the transgender activists by either not passing or watering down proposed legislation establishing “girls-only” sporting competitions under state law. But that claim is simply not true — the NCAA has had a “non-discrimination” policy under which it includes transgender athletes for more than a decade, and it removed seven scheduled national championship events from North Carolina in 2016 in response to the “Bathroom Bill” passed in the state. That law prohibited transgender persons from using the public bathroom of the gender they identified with rather than the bathroom corresponding to their biological sex.
In February 2020, the NCAA was considering how to respond to a newly passed Idaho statute establishing “girls only” sporting contests because a Regional Round of the upcoming NCAA Men’s Basketball Championship was to be held in Boise in March 2020. It became unnecessary for the NCAA to act because the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic forced the cancellation of the event. The facts are that the NCAA has consistently taken the position that it will include “transgender” athletes under its “non-discrimination” policy, and it will not have NCAA Championship events played in locations where it believes that policy is being violated.
I have twice written about South Dakota Gov. Kristi’s Noem’s justified refusal to sign legislation passed by the South Dakota legislature that I viewed as seriously flawed and likely to be struck down in Court. Critics of her decision argued that she was caving in to corporate interests in the state whose only concern was for economic losses they would suffer if the NCAA excluded South Dakota as a hosting site for championship events. Some believed that the NCAA needed to be confronted on the issue, and not appeased.
A few states have joined Idaho in passing new laws intended to secure “girls only” athletic opportunities and competitions. Mississippi, Tennessee, and Arkansas also passed legislation on the subject, with the Governors of Mississippi and Tennessee signing the bills sent to them, but Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchison vetoed the bill sent to him only to have his veto overridden.
Not widely known is the fact that similar legislation is currently pending in 20 other states, and the NCAA statement yesterday is likely meant as a warning to those states in order to attempt to slow down the progress of those bills.
One of the justifications given by Gov. Noem for her decision to not sign the bill sent to her was the fact that it included college athletics within its scope. Her view was that dealing with the issue of adult transgender participation and juvenile transgender participation warranted different approaches. In terms of dealing with the NCAA and college sports, she suggested that a multi-state approach to dealing with the NCAA was preferable to 50 states taking 50 different approaches on the subject and that she would work with the Governors of other states concerned about the subject to address the NCAA on a unified basis.
As more states step forward and pass legislation, the NCAA is going to be put to the test. There are events on the immediate horizon — within the next 90 days — where it may become possible for the events to be played at member institutions rather than a central location like the recently completed Men’s and Women’s National Championship Basketball tournaments were played.
Most notable, the NCAA Men’s College Baseball Championship and the Women’s College Softball tournament will both be underway in approximately 6-7 weeks, around Memorial Day Weekend.
As part of COVID-related changes, the Sub-Regional and Regional rounds of each tournament will be held at pre-determined locations in 2021, rather than being hosted by teams who earned the right to host the events as a result of their performance. Tennessee and Mississippi are states that would normally be considered for hosting opening rounds.
But the more difficult question for the NCAA might arise in connection with the traditional location for the Championship Play in each tournament — Omaha, Nebraska for the men, and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for the women.
Could either one of those states push through similar legislation sometime in the next several weeks? If that were to happen, how would the NCAA respond?
Coffee is good, donuts are bad. Exercise when older is good, Wifey likes it too
At age 48, I was 6’3” and 225 lbs, and could still dunk. At 50, that all changed.
Big 12 and SEC should leave the NCAA.
Time for state governments to ban the NCAA from functioning in any capacity in the state, at either public or private schools because they violate the “safety clause” (I just made it up), of Title Ix sports legislation.
None of their officials would be licensed to operate in those states, the NCAA would not be allowed to enter state-funded schools (and private schools could also ban them on the grounds of discrimination).
The state would forbid its agencies to give the NCAA any type of financial, logistical, or moral support including the use of state-funded stadiums, swimming arenas, etc.
Time to take the cotton gloves off and put the iron/mail-studded ones on and start “swinging for the fence”.
“None of their daughters are going to pushed out of a slot on a team or lose out on a scholarship because Josephine, aka Joe, wants to pretend to be a chick and can’t compete with the fellas.”
If winning has anything to do with it, yes they will. Some girls have already been knocked off their slots on track teams, having been beaten by a biological male pretending to be a woman.
I’m referring to the actual decision makers with the NCAA. I’d bet my last dollar none of their kids are going to schools where this is an issue, yet.
You well might be right about that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.