Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: cuban leaf

The context of Paul’s reference to “scripture” (3:16) in his 2nd letter to Timothy is v. 15, which refers to Holy Scripture and not other secular writings from which an excerpt might be taken.


16 posted on 03/23/2021 10:41:55 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Carl Vehse

Well, I generally agree. But at that time it would have meant the Septuagint, which contains quite a few books we consider not to be canon.


18 posted on 03/23/2021 11:11:26 AM PDT by cuban leaf (We killed our economy and damaged our culture. In 2021 we will pine for the salad days of 2020.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

On a related note, you know where Paul talks about the length of a man’s and a woman’s hair and “nature”? It never really made sense to me no matter how you slice it, until I applied cultural and contemporaneous context.

Then this popped up and it is fully explained:

Paul was a well read man, and Hippocrates was his contemporary. And here is Hippocrates on that exact subject:

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/5813533/pauls-argument-from-nature-for-the-veil-in-michael-s-heiser

Note, there are a lot of sites that discuss this. Just google “hippocrates hair as sex organ” without quotes and you’ll see what I mean.

There is a lot more going on in our bibles than we fully understand.


20 posted on 03/23/2021 11:18:19 AM PDT by cuban leaf (We killed our economy and damaged our culture. In 2021 we will pine for the salad days of 2020.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson