A Simple Test for the Extent of Vote Fraud with Absentee Ballots in the 2020 Presidential Election: Georgia and Pennsylvania Data

SSRN ^ | December 29, 2020 | John R. Lott, Jr.

[rogerantone1]

This study provides measures of vote fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

[tired&retired]

From the paper:

The estimates here indicate that there were 70,000 to 79,000 “excess” votes in Georgia and Pennsylvania. Adding Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin, the total increases to up to 289,000 excess votes.

[elpadre]

OK - is this an official DOJ document? If so, what follows? What action should the DOJ legally take on the basis of the Lott study? What will they do??

[Don Corleone]

OK - is this an official DOJ document? If so, what follows? What action should the DOJ legally take on the basis of the Lott study? What will they do??

View with alarm. Otherwise...nothing!

[RideForever]

Really insignificant accounting math ... THIS would cut to the chase tomorrow -

The procedure for objections might be cut shorter if the newly-seated members of Congress (including McConnell and Pelosi) that were (re-)elected from the [6 / 37] states that use SmartMatic malware for their voting machines are RECUSED from participating in the Electoral College procedure.

Evidence necessary to justify this action would require a matching of MAC device addresses to the voting machines from packets interacting with the Frankfurt server, which establishes an iNet connection was made to overseas assets. This voids the Federal certification of the machines to be used in Federal elections.

The first question to resolve is whether to isolate the 6 battleground states from the 37 potential states, or not, in terms of recusing their Congressional participation in further election determinations.

[volunbeer]

I believe Lott did this on his own. They tout his work for DOJ on a whole host of issues that he has analyzed. He is a wickedly smart guy when it comes to analyzing data.

The data analysis for this election is inexplicable.

Demographic trends tend to be pretty similar. The analysis of “blue cities” in states where they ran clean elections with results published the night of the election vs the counties in question that are very similar via demographics and prior elections is the best statistical evidence that we have that something is amiss that is worth further investigating.

Ask yourself how/why the MSM is not spending days or weeks parsing the data from this election. Usually, post-election, we are treated to two months or more of data analysis from a national election. That has not occurred in this election. Why? Because the data does not make sense. I have not seen any graphs and slides of 2012 or 2016 numbers on the MSM. I have looked at some of them and there are glaring inconsistencies.

Trump improved in many deep blue cities with large minority populations where they ran proper elections yet in the few key counties with the most irregularities there was such a massive turnout amongst the same groups that Biden exceeded the vote of Obama? I don’t buy it nor should you.

The media has a blackout on analysis of the election data. because they know something is amiss and if they look at the data even their own viewers will be left scratching their heads.

Wouldn’t you think all of this is so fascinating that they would try to determine how or why it happened? Nothing but crickets.

[null and void]

View with alarm indifference. Otherwise...nothing!

[StAnDeliver]

"Wouldn’t you think all of this is so fascinating that they would try to determine how or why it happened? Nothing but crickets."

Because, the only people that aren't in on it, are the 74 million + Trump voters. And maybe a handful of legislators and lawyers.

It's a coup, straight up. Hell, this research is good, even great, but when Bald Pate Nate set the PV target as "+3-4% points PV = Biden win", I mean, c'mon: "Hey you better adjust up to 3+".

But the real tell was immediacy of The Bellwether Counties.

If you have even the most remote interest in statistics, this is the most striking and most direct result of Xiden's overstuffing the absentees/mail-ins in Detroit & FultonCo & elsewhere.

It's not that it's an outlier, it is simply that it is not possible to have this standard completely fail, without the direct application of electoral fraud by Xiden's campaign:

[Weirdad]

Nice post. “Follow the science,” Marxist hypocrites.

[StAnDeliver]

Note that, in that bellwether county chart, the only 2 elections that scream "FRAUD!" are 2020, and of course, 1960.

Given that the 1960 fraud revealed itself within the next year, with Democrats bragging how they fixed Cook County and the Johnson counties in Texas, it's merely a waiting game until some underpaid Xiden mandarin truly groks that he was screwed over financially, and goes off the Democrat reservation...