Posted on 11/21/2020 12:12:14 PM PST by Kaslin
“I would continue to encourage him and all journalists to review all the materials we have provided so far and conduct their own investigations.”
Good point from Powell. Are any of the news organizations investigating possible fraud? Are any going beyond saying “without evidence”?
What I don’t get is why anyone ever thought Tucker was so special? I have never been able to watch his whole hour. Even “brilliant” snippets of his talking head would leave me wondering, what do good folks see in him?
I watched the news conference and that is what I heard too. And I’m on day 9 or so of my Foxaholic recovery and I’m doing just fine.
It’s obvious, that with tucker, it’s about his paycheck.
Tucker Romney, or Mittens Carlson...hmm...decisions, decisions...
And that’s what he said last night. In fact he said he HOPED she has the evidence and that it proves the fraud beyond a doubt.
The opinions of media figgers like him don’t matter, what matters is what happens in legislative chambers and courtrooms where actual power is wielded.
This is where they have to be smart. It’s really unfair for a lawyer to say she’s “not trying this case in the court of public opinion” ... while she’s doing a TV interview whose sole purpose is to broadcast her side of the case to millions of people in a TV audience.
“It’s obvious, that with tucker, it’s about his paycheck.”
Well, he’s a golden spoon child and heir to a fortune.
I suspect it’s more about being accepted in the A-list elite crowd.
“Where’s Q?”
Eating Cheetos and posting on 4Chan /pol/ threads.
She wasn't ready to divulge what she had at that time. Besides that, she was busy trying to save this nation.
I suspect you are right. He is a very very fake conservative. Shame on him.
Cucker Tarlson never bothered to offer any actual evidence that his paperwork went missing from a box shipped via UPS.
Yep...he's definitely out of the loop on this now. And he deserves to be.
Right, we all heard that.
And yet Tucker continued with what I would call the msm’s talking point: no evidence.
He’s not dumb, but he’s adopted the same talking point as CNN.
There’s no defense for that.
He’s been bought off.
Ugh. "could have".
"a military officer 'who saw it all done and was there when it was created.'"
Probably General McInerney, who can testify as to the existence of backdoors to manipulate the results, but has no direct knowledge of it being done on November 3-4.
“We’ve got all kinds of evidence that is mathematically irrefutable by experts,
Good evidence, but still circumstantial.
Tucker Carlson is an honest man and has done more than just about anyone defining the issues especially pointing out the vile criminality of Joe Biden. It is unreasonable to criticize him for asking to see the actual evidence , which we all need to see, regarding the fraud. Most rational conservative who followed the election tabulations on election night are faily certain that overt fraud involving paper ballots in the big Democrat controlled urban areas of Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Chicago, LA, New York City and most of NJ resulted in the criminal Biden stealing this election. Carlson is right. It must be proven, the results corrected or people will lose faith in fair elections. Much is at stake. Tucker is right to demand the actual evidence.
Tucker is one of the good guys. That the Democrats are amoral thieves is a given and should suprise no one. What people should be upset with is the Republican National infrastructure. These people are purported political professionals and knew full well that the Democrats in these urban areas would overtly steal. What did they do in advance to stop or mitigate it? The inaction underscores the less than full support that Trump received throughout his term by the political professionals who were employed to help him and implement his policies.
With the way the political climate in this country is right now, and with the media, and big tech being 100% in the bag for the Democrats, why would anyone, especially those that have had stellar careers for many years, put all of that on the line just to lie to the American people?
I think Sidney has built up the hype so much to the point that when the facts come out people will be disappointed.
I understand the PR part....but she is over the top even if she has the goods.
Some of her talk sounds like headlines you read on the cover of the National Enquirer.
Tucker can ask any questions he’d like. He asked Sydney to give him the proof. Any attorney that knows what they’re doing already knows that you never talk to any media about what proof you might have on a case, friendly media or otherwise. Media does not get to decide what needs to be decided by a judge. He’s a big whiny baby that doesn’t like to do the hard lifting or his job.
MotherTucker is dead to me as is all of faux news.
If you are still in the process of building a case, it would be insane to reveal all your findings to the other side while they still have time to destroy evidence. I say give her time to do her job right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.