Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Starman417

One potential complication I see is that when the courts decided that homosexual marriage was okey-dokey, I think they tore down any real basis for the idea that “You can’t marry that person”.

Incestual marriage is not OK? By what standard? And does that standard also indicate that homosexual marriage is OK? What standards are we following? I kind of thought it was “anything goes”.


9 posted on 09/19/2019 10:20:08 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Exactly!

I made that point to many here in Minnesota. “Love Is Love”, they’d say about gay marriage.

I said “OK, then what? If love is love, can a brother and sister marry? Or how ‘bout two sisters? Can an uncle marry his niece? Can a guy marry his dog?”

The retort was always “Don’t be ridiculous. There are standards”. I said “Oh no, there’s not. By allowing gay marriage, you’ve opened up a Pandora’s Box or slippery slope situation that will lead to things that are ruinous to our nation”.

Their response? A grimace, eyeroll or “Don’t be stupid” comment.


19 posted on 09/19/2019 10:59:51 AM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson