Well, note that I used the term “supposedly” and I also put “smart” in quotes as well. So I hope my skepticism came through loud and clear.
But the basis for the my sentence is that MA believes that it is much smarter than other states. We have a lot of colleges. Boston is full of colleges. And across the river, in Cambridge, we have Harvard. Also MIT. Mass is generally seen as a highly educated state.
But this begs the question — does this make the state smart? How many of these college graduates have useless social science degrees? How many spent 4+ years going into debt and have little to show for it except Marxist indoctrination?
Ask any Mass Liberal, and they will tell you quickly that Mass is a really, really smart state.
But what I say is that MA is supposedly a “smart” state. Andy my question to people in MA is: How come we keep electing such terrible politicians?
If the state is very liberal, they might not think that the democRATic politicians they elect are as terrible as folks like you and me on the right think.
I mean the Kennedys are revered as near gods in MA. But there seems to be no logical excuse for Kerry, Markey, Warren, and what was that gay guy's name? Ah, Barney Franks either.
Logic and rationale are inexplicable when trying to explain why democRATS do what they do.
To a democRAT, there can be nothing bad about the politicians they elect. And so the vicious, incomprehensible cycle of electing terrible politicians continues.