J&J sent a note to all employees stating that Reuters is wrong in their reporting.
That J&J tried to show Reuters that the documents they were reporting were faked or were incorrectly identifying quotes to suggest something different than intended.
Reuters would not include their rebuttal in the original story or afterword.
J&J again says there is no asbestos in baby powder and there never was asbestos in the baby powder.
And that Reuters may be falsely continuing this storyline on purpose for improper reasons.
FAKE NEWS
Here’s some of what the American Cancer Society says about talcum powder after acknowledging talc can be contaminated by asbestos during mining
“It is not clear if consumer products containing talcum powder increase cancer risk. Studies of personal use of talcum powder have had mixed results, although there is some suggestion of a possible increase in ovarian cancer risk. There is very little evidence at this time that any other forms of cancer are linked with consumer use of talcum powder.
Until more information is available, people concerned about using talcum powder may want to avoid or limit their use of consumer products that contain it.”
Finally a sane post. Let’s see the proof before jumping to conclusions.
factsabouttalc.com
J&J provides access to 5000 documents used in the litigation. worth a look.
The seeming eagerness by the MSM (with its liberal elitists who imagine a world using 100% recycled products and no furs, with all expenses paid for by the government as a form of social justice, legally smoking bongs, and in which much traditional morality and Biblical principles is scorned), to report industry as being guilty of hidden crime cannot be divorced from its overall ideological agenda.
My take: The MSM overall is driven by a lust for power and prestige, presenting itself as the saviors of the oppressed, who are told they deserve what otherwise is obtained by merit, and thus the MSM can have a basic animus against capitalist industry, which it sees as its competitor for recognition and representing the alternative to its self-serving socialist agenda. And thus it portrays capitalist industry as oppressors, and itself as advocates of those who its longs to show are victimized by it.
Finding some real or fabricated fault with capitalist industry is thus in their self-interest, while fear of them by corporate America is partly what promotes their costly embrace of the homosexual agenda. Strange bed-fellows.
Isn’t Reuters going out of business.. or at least reducing their offerings in the news arena? I guess they figured they’d take a few others with them.