You can’t prove she doesn’t believe it, and there’s no political will to do it. It’s not going to happen in realityville. Move on (irony intended). The real punishment for Dems will be that K will be on SCOTUS for decades, and won’t forget what they did to him and his family.
No, but you might be able to prove that she lied under oath.
I can't claim to have studied the timeline, but I have trouble imagining a person taking a lie detector test who wishes to remain anonymous. What would be the point?
I haven't watched all of Ford's testimony yet but I sensed some evasion when she was asked if a video of the polygraph examination was made. The polygrapher was interviewed and I think he described Ford as being very emotional. It was my understanding that such a state would be incompatible with administering a polygraph.
There's an old movie called "Call Northside 777" which depicts an early administration of a polygraph test. As I recall the administrator MUST establish a baseline of truthful reponses in order to compare them with deceptive responses. The description of Ford's test seemed to indicate only two questions were asked.
The movie gains some credibility because it is also my recollection that the "actor" portraying the man administering the polygraph was actually the inventor of the device.