Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jfd1776

Another good article, but I take exception to the following:

“The proposal’s alleged benefits are built on a foundation of sand, because the pension obligation of today will only grow, but the population of Illinois taxpayers in years to come will only shrink.”

Someone owns the land that is property taxed. Your example covers sales and income tax, rather than the stated property tax. However, as people scramble to leave, property values will likely go down, and they most definitely will go down when the tax comes out, but that loss will be felt by people currently owning the property and not by others choosing to buy the cheaper property.


3 posted on 05/18/2018 8:58:03 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind

Good point.

Property taxes can be a double wealth tax to the property owner.


6 posted on 05/18/2018 9:02:23 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

Why is the Fed trying to solve the problem? Shouldn’t it be the state legislature that does it?
Although what happens if the state declares bankruptcy?


11 posted on 05/19/2018 4:04:38 AM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson