Administrative law and martial law do indeed share some common features. Both are unconstitutional. Administrative law could be thought of as a transition to martial law.
You really need to read Phillip Hambuger’s book. It explains that administrative law requires that ALJs follow the bureau’s policy over State or Federal statute and the constitution. ALJs that deviate can actually face denials of promotions and denials of salary increases for not doing so. Of course, there are no jury trials, hearsay evidence is permitted, and although there are are deadlines for scheduling hearings, there are no consequences for ALJs that delay hearings for years. They are also able to penalize defendants without any charges being brought which deprives the defendant of property and the ability to defend themselves.
James the first of England was a proponent of Adminitrative law becuse he wanted to avoid parlementary oversight and control. He created the dreaded Star Chamber. His son Charles continued the practice and was eventually dethroned and beheaded by parliament in the English Civil War.
Thank you, very much!