No "switch" there, my point is to show that alleged "Southern products" weren't always from "the South".
You, DiogenesLamp & others often claim "the South" produced some huge percent of total US exports:
editor-surveyor: "Do you think we are as stupid as you are?
Youre here to sow confusion on every forum you show up on."
I never judge people's IQ's unless they attack mine, which you are doing here.
Nevertheless, there's no need for me to attack your IQ since you've done a great job of expressing it yourself.
As for "sow confusion", I only present facts to people who may not know them.
Confusing?
Sorry about that.
editor-surveyor: "We all know that you chose Satans game of evolution vs. life, but youre just as wrong in general politics."
I'll be happy to continue discussing evolution on an appropriate thread, but for now, let me leave you with this:
Oh good. You've raised your admitted value of Southern exports from 50% up to 60%. Perhaps if you keep doing your research, you will raise them up to the 73% that I cite from that book, or even up to the 83% that another Freeper says is supported by the Official record.
So the South produced 60% of all the export value, (Meaning they were paying at least 60% of all revenues to the Fed Gov) while having only 1/4th the citizen population of the North. And people wonder why they wouldn't let the South go free.