http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3626604/posts?page=176#176 gives a summary.
If my posts are crap they should be deleted.
If they’re not, then humblegunner needs to be told to stop posting false things about me in order to harm my reputation. There’s a legal word for that but I’m not allowed to use it.
If a moderator here was involved in poisoning my husband and daughter and brags on Fogbow about being a mole with sockpuppets here who war against the goals of FR - and boasted on Fogbow about gagging me to give her sockpuppets a rest, well.... does FR really want to have an anti-conservative, Deep State mole as a moderator? Wouldn’t it be considered loyalty to expose such a thing in a place like this? Wouldn’t it at least be worth checking out, given the shananigans we know the Deep State pulls?
I gather you’re saying that the copyright statement isn’t saying that our posts are copyrighted to us but to the owner of the site, and that the only way we can have control over our own content is if we post to our own blog and then link to it here.
So we can be harassed and ridiculed and have some posters emit so much flatulence that serious posters can’t stand the stink to be on the thread... and then gagged without explanation while nobody knows we’re gagged and can’t respond to the false statements.
Sounds a little bit like a shake-down to me, an attempt to control the narrative, sort of like the Deep State does...
Hopefully this post makes me enough of a “site pest” that I will be banned and my posts deleted just like the guy I was conversing with whose account and posts were deleted at the same time as I was gagged for no reason and then the questions I had friends send to Jim were ignored even when the suspension was a couple days overdue (somebody apparently wanted me gagged indefinitely without having to give a reason). We all know it is possible to delete all posts; we’ve seen it happen many, many times.
If my posts are crap, they should be gone and I should be gone, and you should all be doing the happy dance in the FR happy-dance family.
You seem to have a beef with someone at Fogbow
Seems childish to try and bring it here
See, now.. that right there is the Nuttery stuff.
That is exactly the stuff that is causing all your problems.
Shun it, shun that, cast OUT the nuttery. The nuttery can do you no good.
Yell and holler NUTTERY BEGONE FROM ME!
The nuttery can do you no good.
You're fixing to be hanged at dawn, how can you argue in favor of the nuttery that brought you here?
Fogbow? Troll (mole)? Sockpuppets?
I recognize that MO a mile away.
Foggy, aka PJ Foggy.....that’s one warped m-effer.
Theonly time posts are deleted is when an entire thread is deleted. Other than that, all of your responses—which qualify as public utterances—become the property of the web site on which they're posted, and are not "yours" under copyright law. Furthermore, you have no right to demand that they be deleted.
The number of moderators here on FR is extremely small as far aw I'm aware, and I seriously doubt that any of them are acting against the wishes of JimRob or the intent of the existence of this web site.
However, if you believe any moderator is doing such a thing, a few citations would suffice to help Jim in identifying such a nefarious character.
As for Fogbow, and any falsehoods uttered by its members, I haven't the faintest idea of what you're referring to, and I'd venture to say that nobody else in this community does either.
Does FR really want to have an anti-conservative, Deep State mole as a moderator?
I'm sure FR doesn't, and I'm equally sure that JimRob is fully capable of conducting an audit of his moderator membership to determine whether any such thing has ever occurred.
If I'm not mistaken, JimRob and perhaps his family conduct the overwhelming majority of moderation duties on this forum, so, again, I'm highly skeptical that anything even remotely resembling a "mole" moderator in fact exists.
It is against FR policy to launch vicious personal attacks, and such posts are usually deleted when brought to the attention of a moderator.
To reiterate: if you believe there are some moderators who aren't performing their jobs properly, or indeed are doing so with malicious intent, then—by all means—please provide evidence to support the claim, because evidence can then be acted upon. What can't be acted on is ambiguous, general assertions that aren't supported by any specific evidence.
It's obvious to me that you're taking things far too seriously—and, indeed, you may very well be engaged in a wild goose chase if you thing that someone bragging on Fogbow is also a "mole" moderator on FR. If there's any truth to such claims, I'm positive that Jim will get to the bottom of them.
My advice, once again, is to forget the past for the moment, try to collect actionable evidence moving forward, and don't give undue credence to outlandish—and apparently unfounded—claims made on Fogbow or anywhere else.
If my posts are crap they should be deleted.
Looking back through your posting history, I don't see much that qualifies as "crap". It's actually quite a sparse history, unless much of your postings were contained in threads which have been deleted. Just take a deep breath, start over, and stop demanding to be zotted.
If you truly wish to not participate in this community any longer, then simply ceasing to respond to any threads, and ceasing to post any new threads, will accomplish exactly the same goal. And it will give you the extra option of joining in the discussion once again at some point in the future, after all of this current turmoil is seen for the "water under the bridge" that it truly is...