Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IS THE MORTGAGE DEDUCTION GOOD FOR AMERICA?

Posted on 12/05/2017 8:10:58 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2017 8:10:58 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

No it is not.


2 posted on 12/05/2017 8:12:43 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Yes. End it, or at least reduce it to $250,000 and end it later. Also end all Federal aid to colleges, and yank non-profit status from Big College as well.


3 posted on 12/05/2017 8:13:19 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

We should have a national sales tax and no income tax at all. If we can’t do that, the next best thing is one tax rate and no deductions for anything.


4 posted on 12/05/2017 8:13:19 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

I would disagree that the mortgage deduction is bad. It actually favors people WHO ARE MORE VESTED IN THE ECONOMY AND AMERICA’S WELL BEING. And these people having more disposable income by having their taxes reduced are more likely to contribute to causes, candidates and efforts which further conservatism.

Call that government engineering, but it mirrors solid economics.


5 posted on 12/05/2017 8:16:35 AM PST by fwdude (Why is it that the only positive things to come out of LGBT organizations are their AIDS tests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Anything that restricts the government from confiscating income legally earned by American citizens is good — not just for the person who legitimately earned it, but for liberty and our Republic as well.


6 posted on 12/05/2017 8:17:43 AM PST by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Nope


7 posted on 12/05/2017 8:18:01 AM PST by rrrod (just an old guy with a gun in his pocke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

All it does is drive up the price of a home by making it easier for buyers to pay more for it.


8 posted on 12/05/2017 8:18:06 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: montag813

It should be phased out. I am not for it and yes I do benefit from it. It has been a calculation into home buying for generations. To yank it right away will undercut the housing market and will find a lot of people losing their homes. We do not need a recurrence of the housing bubble.

Allow home owners to keep it as long as they are in their current home. Home values will still come down but at least this gives people time to have their homes reassessed.


9 posted on 12/05/2017 8:18:27 AM PST by Wright Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

A National Sales Tax is called the Fair Tax for a reason. Po’ folk would pay THEIR FAIR SHARE and as a result have ‘skin in the game.’


10 posted on 12/05/2017 8:19:44 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Trim it to $50,000


11 posted on 12/05/2017 8:19:59 AM PST by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

I agree. It is not good. But it’s a great real estate sales tool. ;)


12 posted on 12/05/2017 8:21:10 AM PST by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

It’s welfare for the middle class. Lower it ti 250 for starters. Anyone who can afford ANY home is w/o any deduction is middle class.


13 posted on 12/05/2017 8:22:22 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The price elasticity is not perfect, but your point is taken.

There are many other factors which play into the price of a home which mask the effect of tax deductions. I'd rather address the problem of forced lending and government safety nets to guard against those not really qualified to buy.

14 posted on 12/05/2017 8:23:04 AM PST by fwdude (Why is it that the only positive things to come out of LGBT organizations are their AIDS tests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
It's government interference in the marketplace. It's also a benefit utilized by fewer and fewer Americans. If you aren't itemizing, you aren't benefitting. If you pay so much in interest that it goes beyond the standard deduction, you don't have a genuine "need" for a handout. Additionally, if you have to rely on a government handout to buy a home, you can't afford the home to begin with. Either downsize your expectations or rent. <>
15 posted on 12/05/2017 8:23:18 AM PST by Jhadur ("You are not ready for immortality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus
We should have a national sales tax and no income tax at all. If we can’t do that, the next best thing is one tax rate and no deductions for anything.

Make it EVERYONE PAYS no matter how little they make so EVERYONE has skin in the game and I'm in. Best proposal I've seen on here in awhile.

16 posted on 12/05/2017 8:23:21 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

I don’t like transaction taxes. They inject the government into even MORE of our lives.


17 posted on 12/05/2017 8:23:49 AM PST by fwdude (Why is it that the only positive things to come out of LGBT organizations are their AIDS tests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
Why should some millionaire owner get a tax break

Class envy. It always gets the hoi polloi all worked up.

18 posted on 12/05/2017 8:23:50 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus

I like either option, but lean toward the sales tax. It may never happen, since Congress uses the voluminous tax code to pick winners and losers. The winners help make congresscritters millionaires by the time they leave office.


19 posted on 12/05/2017 8:26:09 AM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus

I would go with the second alternative, emphasis on no deductions at all. The reason is because a national sales tax always leads to questions about “intermediate” sales, like where the company that produces parts for Detroit argues that the sales tax on cars captures the value added by the parts sold to Detroit, saying it represents double-taxation if their sales aren’t excluded. This leaves the enforcement in the hands of politicians who ultimately screw it up.


20 posted on 12/05/2017 8:26:21 AM PST by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson