“Dismissing scientific research as a “fallacy” shows that you know and understand nothing about the scientific process.”
Hilarious. You’ve not presented any “scientific research”. You’ve presented FUD as usual but no actual research data.
“But I know you don’t want to know the current status of research into the effects of marijuana use. “
Another fallacy. If you took the time to actually research my posting history, you’d see I’m a HUGE advocate of pure research into cannabis. Non-govermental, 3rd party research is a must! No “research” from prohibitionist entities or pro-cannabis entities, please.
Let's be honest here, shall we? I gave you the website for the largest catalog of medical research in the world. It contains abstracts and links to articles produced by researchers all over the world. I informed you that you are free to search the database using any search terms you want.
The reason I took this approach, rather than directly link any of the thousands of research articles published in medical journals is because if I link articles, you can then turn around and dismiss them as being cherry-picked or otherwise filtered somehow. You cannot accuse me of cherry-picking if you search for the articles yourself. Of course, you are free to cherry-pick however you want, and I have no control over that.
Another fallacy. If you took the time to actually research my posting history, you’d see I’m a HUGE advocate of pure research into cannabis. Non-govermental, 3rd party research is a must!
Every legitimate researcher has similar education and credentials, regardless of their employer. *If* you would take the time to actually look at the medical research about the effects of marijuana research, you would see that researchers work for all kinds of entities. And, if you happened to find an article published by a government researcher, you would find a disclaimer that the information presented in the article is the opinion of the authors and does not necessarily reflect any opinion or official policy of the US government.
With all of the above said, I am not surprised that you are uninterested in examining the research for yourself. It has been my experience that people who hold anti-scientific positions rarely have any desire to find out what the science actually shows.