[Fred Nerks]

The release of images from the suite did a lot to clarify facts. It is obvious that the shooter is dead, for example...

Nothing is obvious. All you have is the bottom half of a body in one image, and the top half in another:

TOP OF BODY IMAGE

We assume these images make up the body of Paddock. If he was the shooter, has not been established. Has it?

[marktwain]

There is a graphic photo of the mass killer with blood in his mouth and doing a very convincing job of bleeding out of the back of his head.

---

If you want to say nothing is obvious, well, yes everything can be faked.

From that viewpoint, how do we know anyone was shot, at all?

As for the person you named being the shooter (I refuse to give him the after death publicity he seemed to crave) Again, anything can be faked, but that level of fakery is so over the top that you can believe anything and everything, so it becomes a nullity.

[Karl Spooner]

Has anyone ever explained how that weapon got on top of his leg?

[Steve Van Doorn]

In my opinion the only thing established about Paddock was that his body was dead in the room. The top half you can see a lot of blood at his chest. but they don't show his right hand or abdomen. Note: No or very little blood on the revolver claimed he used to kill himself.

Also note how skinny he is compared to his other photos.

[little jeremiah]

So many blank spots, so many holes, so many questions.

Yes, interesting only two photos of two parts of the body.