Posted on 09/15/2017 3:28:42 PM PDT by impetrio1
CNN's Brooke Baldwin can act all shocked at Fox Sports Net's Clay Travis and his clumsy introduction of female attributes in a sports discussion, but the entertainment industry still lives by the "sex sells" credo. There is no other reason why it's so in-your-face, especially during sports programming, punctuated by male enhancement commercials during breaks in the action. Given her faux outrage, Baldwin would be the last to admit that the young men seen during daytime viewing hours are cast to appeal to the bored housewife, home alone during the day.
Nah, it's easier to act all shocked while working for one of the most sexist industries in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at blackandblondemedia.com ...
Jemele Hill is doing exactly what they said.....her ratings are down 20% from last year and she’d love for them to fire her so she can be “candy” on another network.
I find it quite humorous. On the other hand it’s another example of blacks living down to the level of what’s expected of them. It will continue to happen and those who want to prove their honest worth will get fewer chances.
The shush-police didn’t like the word, boobs “on the air!!!!” Cut the mikes!!! (well, at least the one of a virile hetero male who dares to say ‘boobs’)
After a commercial break, where we will see Carls Jr’s skimpy carwash commercials, we’ll cover a story about topless protestors, and then we’ll go to Ralph who’s on the scene at MessedUpU exploring why transsexuals with breast implants often chose softporn occupations.
Yes...
And they complain that men are not attracted to their minds.
rwood
Their ‘thinking’ capability is always affected in this lifestyle.....same with ‘adulterous’ relationships.....you cannot stay on those paths for long without consequences......
Ms.. Hill, shut up and take off your clothes.
5.56mm
“you cannot stay on those paths for long without consequences.”
They’d like to make you think they don’t exist. And in some cases actually saying what they want and not being held responsible for it as acceptable. A case for the discussion on the first amendment.
There are basically two groups of people that are not held responsible for what they say lawyers and politicians. They can say anything in the act of their business and enjoy first amendment rights to cover it. Hardly seems fair, does it?
rwood
Oh I think there are far more than those two groups because we live in an age of unaccountability and little enforcement of the law.... There's a general attitude now that the law is nothing more than a line you work around....thus many opt to navigate that in order to get away with what they are doing......just look at our prison systems where this continues on and on....
I don’t totally disagree with you. But accountability in today thoughts is coming from two directions with an added point. You are, either, accountable to the law, or to yourself. And the point is that the only two groups that can not care what the law is or they change it to protect their interest are the lawyers and politicians. And that’s because no one expects them to be honest. And they know this and just do it. Everyone else can get their thing in a wringer.
rwood
Testing
“Caring” really doesn’t enter the picture when it comes to politicians or lawyers.......neither does ‘truth’. Had a Judge in my hometown , highly respected, who retired early to everyones dismay. When he was asked why he said that there was a time where the courts, attorneys, and society sought for the truth....that he was fed up with Attorneys wanting only to “win” and the truth be damned.
Fox employee goes on a Time Warner channel. No one could have seen this coming. /s
I was working at the county court house doing security, and I noticed one day an attorney I had joked with on his entering a few times was outside and looking very concerned. I went out and asked him if he was okay. He said yes, but he was worried about a verdict he was waiting for.
Later in the day, I saw him outside unhappy. I, again, went out and asked him what happened. He said the court found his client guilty and bound him over for sentencing. I tried to console him by saying he couldn’t expect to win them all as sometimes the person was guilty. He looked at me and said it doesn’t matter if he is guilty or not. His job was to keep him out of jail.
I never talked to him again.
rwood
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.