[robroys woman]

I’d like a return to “you have to own real estate to vote”. Nothing fancy. Even a half acre in Appalachia will do.

[Farmer Dean]

I will either be voting or shooting.The SJW types can decide or me which it will be.

[Senator_Blutarski]

I’d like a return to “you have to own real estate to vote”. Nothing fancy. Even a half acre in Appalachia will do.

Your proposal would create a progressive real estate scheme selling 1 square foot lots for $1000 each.

[goodnesswins]

Or, you have to pay taxes!

[Mears]

“I’d like a return to “you have to own real estate to vote”. “

—

Nonsense-———some of the most patriotic people I know never owned property,andthat includes my mother.

.

[Ohioan]

I think it is way past time that we turned the corner from endlessly seeking to increase the suffrage, to terminating suffrage for those with clear conflicts of interest. It grows more critical by the day!

Threat To Liberty

[PapaBear3625]

I’d like a return to “you have to own real estate to vote”. Nothing fancy. Even a half acre in Appalachia will do.

People who own real estate have a vested interest in seeing their community prosper. If the community doesn't prosper, the value of their holdings go down.

Meanwhile, renters can just move elsewhere after they have done damage to their current community.