Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mother of Terminally Ill British Baby Child Charlie Gard Says Trump, Pope Attention ‘Saved’ Son
NBC News ^ | July 10, 2017 | Eoghan Macguire

Posted on 07/10/2017 3:02:07 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

LONDON — The mother of a terminally ill baby has said her son still has a chance of surviving thanks to the interventions of U.S. President Donald Trump and Pope Francis.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4 early Monday, Connie Yates said that attention brought by comments from Trump and the pontiff had turned their son’s fight for survival into “into an international issue.”

When asked if it had made all the difference, Yates said that it had “saved his life so far.”

Baby Charlie suffers from a rare genetic condition, an inherited mitochondrial disease generally referred to as MDDS, or mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome. As a result, he is unable to move his arms or legs or breathe unaided.

The child’s parents have fought to raise $1.8 million to bring him to the United States for experimental treatment they believe could help.....

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: charliegard; francis; pope; trump

1 posted on 07/10/2017 3:02:07 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

My VERY serious problem with this whole story is that a government (actually two, if you want to consider the EU to be a real government) believes it has the right to kill a baby its parents want to save. Can we all spell “Third Reich”, boys and girls? And no, I did not over-use the Nazi meme; when it’s appropriate, it should be used.


2 posted on 07/10/2017 4:23:49 AM PDT by Pecos (A Constitutional republic shouldnÂ’t need to hold its collective breath in fear of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

“Right to kill” is the correct term. The problem would be more complicated if they wished to continue relying on the socialized medical care—when one relies upon the government to allocate scarce resources, one is taking one’s chances—but as they want to get out of the system, this aspect ceases to be an issue.


3 posted on 07/10/2017 4:35:07 AM PDT by Hieronymus (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

You’re correct. And “it’s for their own good!” doesn’t cut it. What’s next, people with Alzheimer’s?


4 posted on 07/10/2017 4:45:11 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is there any doubt what the child’s life expectancy would be with 0bama or Hillary


5 posted on 07/10/2017 4:45:27 AM PDT by okie 54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

Every senator who does not wish toto tally repeal Obamacare should be primaries and an ad talking about gov’trun healthcare should highlight this baby’s plight! THIS is what we are staring at with gov’t run healthcare....


6 posted on 07/10/2017 4:47:39 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

Yup. An official death panel. If you read any of the comments to the stories available in the press, there was tremendous support. Why are Europeans so willingly subjugated?


7 posted on 07/10/2017 4:51:41 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Except...the Pope changed his position after receiving bad reviews on his first decision.


8 posted on 07/10/2017 5:08:15 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I didn’t realize that papal comments were now interactive. There must be a smartphone app that I need to download, or something.


9 posted on 07/10/2017 5:19:33 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

well said


10 posted on 07/10/2017 5:28:35 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I read that as well. The pope sided with the courts, which surprised me. He then received a lot of negative feedback and flipped his position.


11 posted on 07/10/2017 5:33:01 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

You’re absolutely right.

It shocks me when I look at the comments section on the Daily Mail. Yes I know its not an accurate measure of opinion, but generally it leans right - people are actually turning on these poor parents.

I’m so angry about it - who the hell do these people think they are that they can decide who gets to live and die.

Also a note - Nigel Farage has had these parents on his radio show and is supporting their cause which was pleasing to see.


12 posted on 07/10/2017 5:33:01 AM PDT by UKrepublican (Laurence Norris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

AND he flipped it the day AFTER President Trump’s tweet.


13 posted on 07/10/2017 5:42:03 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

BRING “Baby” CHARLIE GARD TO THE USA FOR TREATMENT, IMMEDIATELY!!! Thank you Pope Francis & POTUS, Donald J. Trump....Champions of life!!!


14 posted on 07/10/2017 6:00:06 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

But, they’re still trapped in England, right?


15 posted on 07/10/2017 6:57:03 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

Agreed. It’s not an argument between diagnosticians, and it’s not a $$$ question. It’s this: who owns the baby?

National govt. agencies?

International govt. agencies?

Correct answer: every baby “belongs” to God, to himself, and to the care/responsibility of his parents.

Butt out, arrogant, patronizing power-grabbers from on high. And take your damned “ethicists” with you.


16 posted on 07/10/2017 7:33:35 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie 54

The question is, if he were Obama or Hillary’s wicked spawn, would the result have been the same?


17 posted on 07/10/2017 8:05:05 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

Not exactly correct. A representative of the Vatican sided with the courts, the Pope then came out with his, favoring Charlie.


18 posted on 07/10/2017 8:06:36 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

exactly. He was not a profile in courage on this by any means.


19 posted on 07/10/2017 8:08:07 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Did NBC news change article title?


20 posted on 07/10/2017 3:28:07 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson