Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. States Can’t Have Own Self-driving Car Rules Under Trump Presidency
Cars18 ^ | June 19, 2017 | Arjit Garg and Reuters

Posted on 06/19/2017 1:10:32 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

California and other states would be barred from setting their own rules governing design and testing of self-driving cars, while federal regulators would be blocked from demanding pre-market approval for autonomous vehicle technology, according to a U.S. House Republican proposal reviewed by Reuters on Thursday.

The draft legislation, while far from becoming law, still represents a victory for General Motors Co, Alphabet Inc, Tesla Inc and other automakers and technology companies seeking to persuade Congress and the Trump administration to pre-empt rules under consideration in California, New York and other states that could limit deployment of self-driving vehicles.....

(Excerpt) Read more at news18.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; automobiles; automotive; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: DallasGal

This is what I’m talking about!

Plus, the whole road rage thing will be directed at your own car. Who will I give the finger to?


21 posted on 06/19/2017 4:44:31 AM PDT by perez24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DallasGal
I had a rental with steering assist and land departure.

A flying car!!!

I want one of those...!

22 posted on 06/19/2017 5:05:33 AM PDT by Does so (PARIS is like OPEC, except We're Winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
I'm not certain why there is a push to go driverless. What are you supposed to do, if you are not driving? Sit and stare out the window...

I make a 2000 mile "commute" twice a year; plus, I may be an Executor in a few years, where a 3000-mile "commute" may be necessary. You don't want me dozing off after 10 hours behind the wheel!

Driverless cars can't come soon enough...

23 posted on 06/19/2017 5:09:27 AM PDT by Does so (PARIS is like OPEC, except We're Winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Does so

Oops! Lane...


24 posted on 06/19/2017 5:45:00 AM PDT by DallasGal (I've come to believe lack of remorse or failure to apologize means you are heartless and soulless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: perez24

Bahaha!!! Hadn’t though about that.


25 posted on 06/19/2017 5:46:18 AM PDT by DallasGal (I've come to believe lack of remorse or failure to apologize means you are heartless and soulless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

A garbage headline


That is what I thought. They really twisted words to get that headline.


26 posted on 06/19/2017 6:07:10 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom; All

What are you supposed to do, if you are not driving? Sit and stare out the window because doing anything else causes motion sickness?


I suppose you can take a weekend trip to the (mountains, beach, farm, relatives) whatever, go to sleep on Friday night in the car, wake up refreshed on Saturday morning 500 miles away. Leave Sunday night, and wake refreshed on Monday morning, back home and ready to do the days duties.


27 posted on 06/19/2017 6:14:00 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

“Since regular vehicles have federal standards so should driverless”

Darn right!

Some Dip wad state like CA would make it so all you have to do is make sure the car is ‘fair trade’ and ‘organic’ and ‘sustainable’ and who cares if it runs over people.


28 posted on 06/19/2017 9:05:31 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I suspect the provocative term “driverless vehicle” is being used to get attention, stir debate and add a “wow” factor to marketing efforts, and that it will soon be replaced with something like “semi automated vehicle” or “technology assisted driving”.

The actual application of robotics technology to privately owned vehicles is likely to be phased in and wind up somewhere along the continuum between human driven and robot driven.

In fact, we are already along that continuum. Consider the fact that many aspects of driving are already partially or fully automated. Lights, wipers, gear transmission, braking, acceleration (cruise control) and even parking are already fully or partially automated.

Autopilot has existed in rail, flight and marine transportation for many decades, and yet any trend toward increased use of autopilot functions stops short of being fully “driverless”. Somebody is always present to engage, disengage and monitor the autopilot function, and manual override is always an option.

Perhaps in space, in cases where “driving” consists of maintaining a fixed orbit or a fixed course for long periods, a driver may not be needed even to monitor the instruments, but I doubt driverless cars will be dropping kids off at kindergarten any time soon.


29 posted on 06/19/2017 9:34:47 AM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It would be senseless to have 50 sets of rules, some or many of which would not be compatible with others.


30 posted on 06/19/2017 10:19:12 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I suppose you can take a weekend trip to the (mountains, beach, farm, relatives) whatever, go to sleep on Friday night in the car, wake up refreshed on Saturday morning 500 miles away. Leave Sunday night, and wake refreshed on Monday morning, back home and ready to do the days duties.

Unless you are prone to motion sickness, in which case you will sleep very poorly, if at all, and be constrained to sit quietly and just stare, mostly straight ahead.

The only thing that helps with motion sickness is driving. For some reason, the act of driving seems to override whatever goes on in the head to cause the sickness.

Driverless cars do *not* sound pleasant at all to me.

31 posted on 06/19/2017 4:50:25 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Insurance regs are going to be a big hurdle,probably expensive. Also,just the car itself is going to be more expensive. Where does this leave those unable to afford such a monstrosity? Also,suppose a driver-less car is involved in an accident with an older driver-controlled vehicle. Betting the driver-controlled will always be found at fault.


32 posted on 06/19/2017 5:37:04 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson