That would take a *long* time to fully explain.It has to do with my personal experience with lawyers (my case was connected to an individual who somehow made $75 million of other people's money disappear.It was written up in papers from coast to coast).It also has to do with my experience with women who've claimed to have been raped (decades working in a big city ER).And there are other factors as well.
As for OJ...the prosecution's mistake was to present a case designed for jurors with an IQ of 100.Johnnie Cochrane knew that moving the trial "downtown" was his only hope.
One of the first cases i paid attention to was Tawana Brawly here in NYC. One accuser (although her legal team tried to make it look like the entire black community was doing the accusing) against several defendants. Duke Lacrosse. If you want to find weak cases its one accuser. oF course they make up the great majority and who knows what the percentage is but i can’t think of multiple accusers where the defendant was innocent. Micheal Jackson? but that never reached this point in the legal system that i can recall. I will certainly say some of Cosby’s accusers are probably after money but its nowhere near all.